Sunday, September 08, 2013

Exposing The Real Canardos (An Angry Hate Post)

My father told me all about the birds and the bees, the liar - I went steady with a woodpecker till I was twenty-one ~ Bob Hope (5/29/1903 to 7/27/2003) an English-born American comedian, vaudevillian, actor, singer, dancer, and author who appeared on Broadway, in vaudeville, movies, television, and on the radio. He was noted for appearing in over 70 films and shorts, including a series of "Road" movies co-starring Bing Crosby and Dorothy Lamour.

A short while ago the blogger Lester Nation (AKA "rAtional nAtion" or RN abbreviated) started calling me "Canardo". This was a new nickname, coming after the series based on the last name Sanders. "Harlan" or "Colonel" or just "Col". Now they seemed to have moved on to "Dervie" or "Dervy". I'm not sure but I think they've moved on from "Canardo", perhaps because I figured it out.

At first it didn't make any sense to me. I thought it sounded Hispanic, but eventually I realized that removing the "O" from the end resulted in the word "canard", which is "a false or baseless, usually derogatory story, report, or rumor". So, looks like Lester and Dennis are both calling me a liar. Lester never confirmed that this is what he meant by calling me "Canardo", but this is my best guess (a solid guess I would say, and probably accurate.

This brings me to the purpose of this post. Lester invited me back to his blog; I went, but only submitted a short comment at first to see if Lester would publish it. He did, so I jumped in and joined the conversation. Of course commenting on the Lester blog invites arguments, as there is nobody there I agree with politically; at least I don't agree with any of the three major players who dominate most of the conversation, those people being rAtional nAtion (or "Lester Nation", as I like to call him... although his real name is "Les Carpenter III) Willis Hart and Dennis Marks.

Fact is, each of these three amigos dislikes me with some intensity. This explains the "Canardo" slur. They all think I'm a liar. As well as the fourth amigo, the lying ID spoofer Rusty Shackelford. Funny thing is, the lying and dishonesty that is actually taking place is all coming from these four. A recent conversation turned to accusations of lies from them but... I did not lie. The conversation ended when Lester refused to publish my response to an accusation of lying (through my teeth, no less) by Willis. I do not know why, but this is a subject, when it comes up, I am usually always accused of lying about by Mr. Hart.

The Hartster opposed the Iraq war. He's talked about it many times, usually he's solidly against it, although he often makes a point of defending George W bush. On 8/1/2012 Willis said...

Willis Hart: A strong case could have been made for deposing [Saddam] on humanitarian grounds alone. That was the rationale for taking out Gadaffi and Hussein was infinitely worse ... [so] maybe we can give some slack to [George bush?] (8/1/2012 at 4:44pm).

OK, so Willis thinks the invasion of Iraq was "boneheaded" but he usually makes a point about defending GWb. Even though GWb lied about WMD (Willis denies GWb lied despite the fact that it is obvious).

But the point is Willis was against the invasion. It's in print on his blog (multiple posts). So saying he supported it would not be truthful. Yet he says this is what I did (the "lying through your teeth" comment). My question is, what's with this guy? Could this "lying through my teeth accusation" have something to do with this comment (one Lester actually published)?

Dervish Sanders: As I recall there were many on the Conservative side who cited Saddam's killing of his own citizens as an extremely good justification for taking action (Willis, Dennis and others). (Thu Sep 05, 10:39:00 AM).

And, in response Willis published this angry comment...

Willis Hart: wd is lying through his teeth on this one. As he knows I was fully against the Iraq war FROM DAY ONE and well before John Kerry, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton turned against it. Les and I are the consistent ones on this issue and wd the partisan stooge who suddenly supports military action simply because a Democrat has backed himself into a corner (much like he did in Afghanistan). Shameless. (Thu Sep 05, 11:48:00 AM).

First of all I don't support military action in Syria. I never said I did. Secondly, Barack Obama has NOT "backed himself into a corner". Willis says this only because bashing the president is his new thing (previously Will said he voted for him in 2008). And, in regards to the "lying through my teeth allegation"... I said it was an "extremely good justification" not that it was the Hartster's justification. Willis himself said "A strong case could have been made" on his own blog! As you can see, I was referencing comments Willis made on his own blog, yet the dummy says I lied!

(BTW, I didn't include a link in my original comment... something that would have been proof that Willis talked about this justification, but I was only referring to things I remembered him saying. I didn't go back and actually find the Contra O'Reilly post until now).

In response to Willis' false accusations of "lying through my teeth" I composed a comment and submitted it for publication, but Lester decided to trash-can what I wrote. This is a underhanded tactic he's used before... he will wait until a point in the discussion comes when no response from me makes me look bad. Previously I made a mistake and everyone jumped all over it, calling me stupid and a liar. I submitted a correction (admitting my error) but Lester declined to publish it. Here Willis says I lied (when I was referring to comments made by Willis on his own blog) and Lester refuses to publish my rebuttal.

Honestly, however, I only realized the misunderstanding of Mr. Hart when I went back and re-read what I originally wrote (now, not when I composed and submitted the comment Lester didn't publish). In the comment Lester did not publish I said Willis was "canardo-ing through his teeth". If Lester had published I might retract that accusation. It was a misunderstanding.

However, and this is a big however, Willis seems to OFTEN "misunderstand" comments by me and immediately responds with ANGRY accusations of lying. It happened earlier in the same thread (concerning another topic that would take some time to explain. If you are interested you can read the thread yourself here). Willis said "you're a liar, wd. I fully know the difference between an Arab and a Muslim", But I never said he didn't know the difference.

I explained myself on this one, and I think Willis accepted my explanation, as he didn't repeat the "lie" accusation in his response... but he did make a new one a short while later. Either I'm a bad writer, and that explains why Willis frequently misinterprets what I mean (and concludes I'm lying)... or Willis is allowing his dislike (possibly hatred) for me to color his interpretation of what I write. It seems he's always looking for "lies" by me that he can immediately pounce on.

Given that Willis has "now concluded [that Dervish] is a pathological liar", and (in the comment thread belonging to the post in which he made this accusation) declared me a "virulent liar" and "absolutely insane"... I'm thinking it's Willis' prejudices against me that is causing him to imagine lies by me where there were none (and not any bad writing from me).

I'm not a liar or a "Canardo", and this is my proof of that (seeing as Lester wouldn't publish my rebuttal I'm not going to try again). In fact I think my time on the blog of Mr. Nation is nearing it's end (Lester is becoming increasingly hostile). But Lester might decide we're friends again and urge me to come back. It was not that long ago that Lester declared I was "banned forever", but turns out that was just another of Lester's canardos.

Hopefully this sets the record straight regarding who the real canardos are. Currently they hang out at two blog... The first one being Contra O'Reilly (the blog of Willis Hart) and the second the ironically titled rAtional nAtion uSA (the blog of Lester Nation).

Update 9/10/2013: Lester read my post and commented elsewhere that my comment (the one he refused to publish) was in his spam folder. He went and retrieved it and now it is published. Sure RN, I'm positive that is exactly what happened. Or, could it be that Lester refused to publish until he read my commentary above, then saw his chance to call me a liar by publishing what I wrote? Below is the highly suspect response by RN. Suspect because comments before and after were published. Just this one was inexplicably sent to the Spam folder.

rAtional nAtion: The dude is claiming I don't post his comments. Another canard. I checked my spam after noticing his false claim and low and behold. They are now posted. As expected the usual canards from the Canardo. (9/8/2013 AT 5:13pm).

Right. The canardo doesn't publish until he sees an opportunity to call me a liar after doing so (AFTER reading this post, an action he acknowledges with his comment). RN's fellow canardos will surely believe him, but I do not.

SWTD #202 lDel #7, wDel #34.

33 comments:

  1. An example of a recent lie from Dennis...

    dmarks (AKA Dennis Marks) [9/7/2013 at 11:05am] The Bush administration argued that its actions in Iraq were in accordance with existing resolutions and international law. The UN did not object to this interpretation.

    They did object...

    When bush ordered the invasion of Iraq he violated Articles 33 and 39 of the UN Charter, which is why Kofi Annan (UN Secretary-general from 1/1/1997 to 12/31/2006) said the war "was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter". This statement by Anon was made during a 9/16/2004 BBC interview while he was still the UN leader (not after his term expired).

    (Excerpt from my 5/23/2013 post, "Intellectual Honesty Concerning ex-President bush's WMD Lies").

    ReplyDelete
  2. I Am Going to Put this Into Words that Even an Imbecile Can Understand - a) Yes, I was against the Iraq War and, yes, I continue to think that it was a stupid idea, especially considering the boneheaded
    implementation of it; deBaathifying the government, disbanding the military, nation-building, making deals with the extremists, etc..............b) You're the one, wd, who introduced the variable of humanitarianism (spinning for the current occupant of the White House simply because he's got a D in front of his name). My only point was to say that if humanitarianism was the rationale for this episode, then a much, Much, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH stronger humanitarian case could have been forth against Saddam Hussein who routinely raped, murdered, and tortured his people and who actually tried to eradicate the Kurds. I still probably would have opposed the intervention (fearing that it would strengthen Iran and possibly cause a civil war within Iraq) but we'll never know, now will we, because that's not what Mr. Bush emphasized.............There, does that clear it up for you?......Oh, and this constant defense of mine for Bush centered around 2 rather rudimentary things; a) that he isn't a war criminal (especially given that you're so quick to defend the equally questionable tactics of FDR, LBJ, and Obama) and b) that the dude doesn't hate poor people (the fact that entitlement and social spending both skyrocketed under the man). It would have been nice if you had included this in your post but neither is it surprising that you didn't.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's a whole lot that has nothing to do with the one simple point I made... which is that you did bring up humanitarian issues as a justification for the invasion of Iraq on your blog. Guess I wasn't "lying through my teeth", huh?

    So, Will admits I did not lie, but instead of just saying that YES, he did bring that up in the past, my bringing it up now means I'm an imbecile. First of all, I never said humanitarianism wasn't an issue in Iraq, and I'm not "spinning" it as an issue now because the president is Democratic. Humanitarianism is always an issue! Not a issue that should cause us to consider any kind of invasion, however. Not then and not now. There is no "spinning" by me going on because Barack Obama is a Democrat.

    As for the chemical weapons that were used against the Kurds... Reagan and Bush shouldn't have authorized our selling them to Saddam. Also, let me see if I'm getting this right... what you're saying is that... we sold Saddam the chemical weapons (or the ingredients for them), he used chemical weapons against the Kurds, we sold him some more chemical weapons, and then we use that as (part) of our justification to invade... more than a decade later?

    Right, Will. As for that last bit about other subjects that I should have included in my post but didn't and that isn't surprising... huh? I could write another post on that, but that's another subject. Maybe THAT explains why I didn't include it in this post?

    In conclusion I must say that what has been "cleared up" for me is that Will is a canardo, at least when it comes to imagined "lies" that aren't lies and obfuscating replies that somehow arrive at the conclusion (or, actually start out with the conclusion) that the person who didn't lie is an imbecile.

    Also... [1] I thought you never read this blog. [2] What the hell have you got against the use of paragraphs? I've seen you use them in replies on RN's blog. But you (clearly) wrote this up for your blog and cut and pasted it from there (and you NEVER use paragraphs in any of your blog posts). WHY?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Us "White" people are tired of being labeled " bigots"by idiot progressives like you. I am tired of being labeled a “racist” I am tired of your BullShit.
    Personally, You were full of shit defending Trayvon Martin and now and your full of shit defending Obama.. And Obama’s full of shit, defending his stupid actions.
    Congress needs to reject war with Syria because involving the U.S.A. in another country's civil war is TOTAL INSANITY.
    I'm sure Jihad Jimmy Carter is dancing in the streets because Obama just took the title of the most insane and inept POTUS ever. One day they will find him in the oval office endlessly mumbling "Who took my marbles away?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The estranged wife of George Zimmerman opted not to press charges against her husband Monday after police in Florida responded to her sobbing 911 call reporting he had punched her father and was threatening them with a gun.

      "I'm really scared,'' Shellie Zimmerman can be heard telling Lake Mary, Fla., police in an audio recording of a 911 call placed around 2 p.m. Monday to authorities in the suburb northeast of Orlando.

      ----------

      What's wrong with all the people in Zimmerman's life?
      Everyone he encounters is so seriously screwed up that he has no choice but to assault them or pull a gun on them.

      What is it with these people?"

      Delete
  6. You are a liar. That has been proven time and time again. I proved it on your last hate post.
    Another hate post here
    Congratulations
    You are a member of the RN, Dmarks, Will crowd of lying, SHITHEAD, bigoted ass holes.
    Aren't you proud.
    You and RN are now butt fuck buddies
    The same
    Two peas in a pod
    Knew you could do it

    ReplyDelete


  7. If you were spat upon for a few years......and you were just a good citizen doing the right thing....you would be a little pissed off too....way to go George,,,get rid of that c^*t.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I said below, the type of goons who love Zimmerman, an unarmed teen killer, also refer to women as c**ts. We don't need to say anything more, do we.

      Delete
  8. More on George Zimmerman. Where are his cheerleaders now? First he kills an unarmed teenager, now he's bullying a woman?

    We can see why the righties thought of him as a hero. What a guy.

    "George Zimmerman was taken into custody Monday after his estranged wife called 911 on him.

    According to the 911 call, George Zimmerman kept telling his wife to move closer while he was holding a gun. It sounded like George was trying to set up another case of stand your ground.

    Shellie Zimmerman told the 911 dispatcher that a witness sitting in his truck saw the entire altercation. She broke down sobbing saying she was scared and in shock."

    What a p.o.s.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And by the way, don’t bug me with George Zimmerman, he may be a jerk and everything else you want to call him, but he was STILL not guilty of murder.... period It's over, I don’t give a crap about him and especially the CREEP Trayvon Martin the THUG . I can't get excited over any of this any longer.
    The liberals will still hound him into an early grave, no matter what he does or doesn’t do.
    So don’t bring him into today’s picture, write about something meaningful like Obama Screwing up the whole world. No some meaningless subject to distract everyone from the real issues! And by the way, tomorrow is the anniversary of Benghazi where 4 Americans died, and it was blamed It on a stupid Youtube by or our Dufus president Madam Secretary, and Susan Rice. How about talking about that instead of George Zimmerman who took out the trash!.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...but he was STILL not guilty of murder.... period."

      The jury found Zimmerman not guilty of manslaughter. That doesn't change the fact that he KILLED an unarmed teenager. Who, BTW, did not have an arrest record like Zimmerman, who actually assaulted a police officer, had abused women in the past, and now is named by his wife as a bully and threatening to do her and her father harm. And you idiots call Trayvon Martin a "thug?" Apparently you don't know the meaning of that word. Bwahahahahaha!



      "...write about something meaningful like Obama Screwing up the whole world."

      Written like a low-information Foxnewser. Nothing's happened in the world. Not a shot has been fired by the US military over the Syria issue. Not one.

      Go burst your blood vessels over something real.





      "And by the way, tomorrow is the anniversary of Benghazi where 4 Americans died."

      Typical low-information gooper. All they can write is a noun, a verb, and Benghazi. You didn't get the message, did you. There was no scandal. Too bad, so sad, your juvenile hopes have all been smashed.


      Delete
  10. Sorry to burst your stinky progressive bubble Mr. Whyte, but it's not OVER., It’s only over IN YOUR pointy little heads.
    What a Jerk-Off this guy above is.
    Yeah we know all these Obama cult members will dismiss and deny anything that was mishandled by them... I mean really who cares an American citizen was killed over it, all the while BEGGING for help..
    And only in Obama’s administration can a LIAR like Susan Rice lye like a rug about Benghazi and get a promotion for it..
    You are a real piece of work...you post this shit from all over the boards from those scum at Shaws place to AOW’s
    How some of you idiots on the left can stand yourselves...beats me
    So pretty pretty pwease shut the HELL up already.

    ReplyDelete
  11. George Whyte Said
    "The jury found Zimmerman not guilty of manslaughter. That doesn't change the fact that he KILLED an unarmed teenager"

    "an unarmed teenager"? You mean that drugged up gangsta wannabe walking around with his mixing the Arizona Iced Tea and skittles to get a form of codeine and God only know what else!
    Trayvon was a lowlife thug who was looking for trouble and and he found it.
    I feel sorry for Zimmerman, It must be hell to be a creepy ass cracka in America!

    ReplyDelete
  12. DS, there's more to the Zimmerman story. Where are his supporters who come here and blather about what a true patriot Zimmerman is?

    "The Florida police chief that is actively investigating a confrontation between George Zimmerman, his wife and his father in law says someone is lying: either George Zimmerman or his lawyer.

    Both the Lake Mary Florida Police Chief, Steve Bracknell, and the department’s spokesman Zach Hudson confirmed to ThinkProgress that George Zimmerman told officers at the scene that he did not have a gun on him during the incident. This directly contradicts what ZImmerman’s lawyer, Mark O’Mara, told CNN:

    O’MARA: He acted appropriately. He never took the weapon out. The only thing he really did, which is what he told the police, was on the outside of his shirt, he made sure the gun wasn’t moving anywhere and didn’t do anything because [Zimmerman's father-in-law] Mr. Dean was sort of coming at him, that can sort of be seen in the video.

    COOPER: So he had the gun actually on his person not like, in the glove box of his car?

    O’MARA: That’s correct.

    Bracknell acknowledged the contradiction, asking, “Who is telling the truth? Good question.” He added that O’Mara was “on scene providing legal advice to hid [sic] client.” Bracknell appeared to suggest that O’Mara was well-informed of the facts of the case and had little reason to invent facts — like Zimmerman having a gun — that would be damaging to his client."



    ReplyDelete
  13. More on the scam artist George Zimmerman and how he took money from the dupes who contributed to his "defense fund." He hasn't paid his lawyers with the money all his rightwing buds sent to him!

    More and more is coming out about the creep who the righties made into a hero. Some hero. He assaulted a policeman, was named in domestic violence, killed an unarmed teen, threatened his wife and father-in-law, destroyed the evidence, and now we find he didn't pay his lawyers, even though people sent him money ($300+ thousand) for his defense fund?

    And the righties who come here called Trayvon a thug??

    George Zimmerman Scammed Gun Nuts Out Of A Lot Of Money; Never Paid Attorneys

    ReplyDelete


  14. Jesus H. Christ George.......give it a break already......Zimmerman shot and killed a thug in waiting and the world is a better place because Trayvon isn't in it..

    A jury of your fellow americans did the correct thing.....did Zimmerman get arrested the other day....I don't think so.....must be he didn't do anything....its over sparky,deal with it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wassa madda, Rusty? The truth about the p.o.s. Zimmerman too painful?

    May I remind you that a jury of YOUR fellow Americans found O.J. INNOCENT?

    And it ain't over till it's over bubba.

    ReplyDelete
  16. D.S. I'm posting this information because of the number of rightwing nutters who came here supporting and defending George Zimmerman and who called Trayvon Martin a "thug" who deserved to be killed. We knew then that those who did this, like Rusty Shackleford, were useful idiots repeating rightwing propaganda. Now the truth about George Zimmerman is coming out, and it enforces what we suspected: that he was a bully and a first class creep, and that the trial that let him get away with murder wasn't all that it should have been:

    Attorney for Trayvon Martin Medical Examiner Claims He Was Told to ‘Shut Up’

    "Dr. Shiping Bao, the associate medical examiner in the Trayvon Martin case who was fired last week, is preparing a $100 million dollar lawsuit over wrongful firing.

    His attorney alleges that Dr. Bao was scapegoated because Florida state prosecutors deliberately threw the case.

    Dr. Bao was prepared to offer proof that Martin was not the aggressor, according to local Channel 9 (WFTV).

    Dr. Bao’s attorney Willie Gary alleges that the medical examiner, state attorney’s office, and Sanford Police Department were all biased against Trayvon Martin. Gary told Channel 9, “He says their general attitude was that he got what he deserved. He was in essence told to zip his lips. ‘Shut up. Don’t say those things.’”

    Gary claimed that prosecutors never asked Dr. Bao a question crucial to the case, which would have allowed Dr. Bao to offer proof that there was no way that Trayvon Martin was ever on top of Mr. Zimmerman."

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. George Zimmerman still has a PERFECT shooting record!

    ReplyDelete
  19. If you will allow one more, D.S., so that the jerks who supported the real thug, George Zimmerman, can see how stupid their judgement of character is:

    "The disbelief that ricocheted around the nation Monday at Zimmerman's latest high-profile encounter with the law was summed up piquantly by the police chief of Lake Mary, Fla. After answering the 20th media call of the afternoon, Chief Steve Bracknell told a Los Angeles reporter what he really thought of the man acquitted in the killing of unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin.

    "Man, it would be fantastic if you have an apartment out there [in California] for George Zimmerman," Bracknell said. "This guy is killing me."

    It is disgusting to read the yahoos on the right who defamed an unarmed teenager and who defend the real THUG: George Zimmerman!

    ReplyDelete
  20. R.R.: "George Zimmerman still has a PERFECT shooting record!"

    Yeah. Shooting off his mouth and shooting himself in the foot.

    The police in Lake Mary, Fla., would like to see your hero thug run out of town.

    Give the a**hole enough rope, and he'll eventually hang himself. He's well on his way to doing that now. The police AND his own lawyer would like to see him Trayvon martin himself.


    ReplyDelete
  21. George Zimmerman was found NOT guilty! What part of the word "NOT" dont you understand?
    George Zimmerman was acquitted. However, the lefts lynching of Zimmerman goes on. The race merchants Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are determined, with the support of the NAACP and the media, to continue race baiting and dividing this nation.
    George Zimmerman went through several grillings, explaining right from the beginning what happened. The civil-rights group, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Benjamin Crump and the media made it into a circus.

    The prosecution threw all kinds of obstacles in the path of the defense and used emotion rather than facts because they didn't have any. The facts are clear that Zimmerman was attacked and shot Trayvon Martin while in fear of his life
    It is high time that the Justice Department looked into Zimmerman's civil rights and brought cases against Sharpton, Jackson and some media outlets who convicted Zimmerman before the trial.Obama made this a race issue when he stated that if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin! So typical of that idiot in the White House.It’s kinda hard to find anything that this President days credible when he listens to songs like “Nigga Please” or “Niggas in Paris” from his buddy Jay Z.
    The real tragedy is that this was ever allowed to be railroaded into a courtroom to begin with. Sad state of affairs in this country when one can be charged for self-defense, even when the police themselves refuse to arrest you because they know there hasn't been a crime committed.
    You and your stupid Leftist buddies like Shaw and Octo and the Critter asshole should Stop playing the race card. He was cleared by a jury. It always has to boil down to race. If it was a white kid he would have been pulled into court and cleared if all the evidence was the same. This is getting pretty damn ridiculous now

    ReplyDelete
  22. I accidentally deleted the following comment by "Darth Bacon"...

    George Zimmerman for President.! Because he couldn't be any worse than we have.

    Posted by Darth Bacon to Sleeping with The Devil at 9/12/2013 6:05 AM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go ahead, Darth, run Zimmerman for president. He will just be one more in a long line of republican presidential losers, and you will insure the continuation of a Democrat as President through 2020. Man, you guys are really smart! Brilliant strategy. Then you can continue to bitch and moan and not have to take responsibility for anything. Come on Darth. Let's hear it. Whine whine whine!

      Delete
  23. Guess Who wrote: "George Zimmerman was found NOT guilty! What part of the word "NOT" dont you understand?"

    We understand perfectly that the jury found Zimmerman not guilty of manslaughter. What YOU don't understand is that the verdict does not change the fact that Zimmerman KILLED an unarmed teen, that Zimmerman, in the past, had ASSAULTED A POLICE OFFICER, that Zimmerman had been charged with DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, that Zimmerman is now accused by his WIFE of THREATENING her and her father, and that Zimmerman allegedly destroyed EVIDENCE of said threats and abuse, and that Zimmerman, according to his OWN DEFENSE LAWYER, hasn't paid his lawyers' fees, despite having collected over $300 thousand through his "defense fund." Show them the money, GEORGE! Where did it go? Buying more guns?

    YOU and your sock puppets are the ones who keep defending this pathetic man. Give it up. Zimmerman is doing the "lynching" of his character all by his stupid self. He's the one who has exposed himself for what he is, he doesn't need any help from anyone else, since he's doing a fine job of making a colossal jackass of himself--according to the local police.

    Defend him all you like "Guess Who" and your sock puppet Darth Bacon. He's all yours. And he's a perfect example of the sort of person you and your ilk admire. A pathetic bully and loser.

    ReplyDelete
  24. What a schmuck you are. Even worse than I thought.
    By the way, Martin is Dead & Zimmerman is Alive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that brilliant observation, Darth. By the way, that is usually the relationship between the killed and the killer, just in case you did not know it.

      Delete
  25. Oh I know it, just reminding the A-holes on the left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brilliant work Darth Baby. Keep up the remarkable efforts!

      Delete


  26. Question for you Whytie....you've got Zimmerman guilty of everything except the JFK assignation. The question....is Zimmermen presently sitting in jail at the moment?
    When do you expect Zimmernam to be arrested of all these crimes? We he be arrested within the next few days,weeks,months...what is your prediction?
    When will that Chinamen who got fired for imcompetence file his law suit.

    If George Zimmerman is guity of all these terrible crimes why the hell is he walking around free?

    Oh yea...one more question.....is Trayvon Martin still dead?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People frequently get away with crimes... either outright (never caught), or let go by racially prejudiced juries. Just because Zimmerman was set free at the end of his show trial does not mean he isn't guilty, Mr. Schmuckelford.

      But sooner or later I suspect he's going to get in trouble for something. The reports cited by Mr. Whyte show that to undoubtedly be the likely scenario. What then will the Schmuckelfords of the world say?

      George Whyte: Defend him all you like "Guess Who" and your sock puppet Darth Bacon.

      "Guess Who" is likely (very likely) a sock puppet of Rusty's. I do know for certain that "Guess Who" is the individual who spoofed your ID. I actually said he was banned after that.

      Delete

Unfortunately comment moderation is necessary in order to screen out insanity from an idiot calling himself "Luke" of the "Words And Music" blog (a liar who has made bogus accusations that many others are stealing his posts) as well as homophobic hate from TOM of the blog "Stay A While" (actually the same person).