Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Exposing The Truth About 101

Although it hurts, I think we have to say that if there is fraud of any kind... it has to be exposed, no matter what the cost. The truth is of more value than anything else ~ John Gerhart (11/27/1907 to 1/9/1981) a United States Air Force four-star general who served as commander of the North American Air Defense Command under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson.

This is a commentary that concerns shitheads and people who are nuts. These aren't pejoratives I ever used to describe anyone, or I didn't use them first, at least... this is a bogus claim made by the blogger Joe "Truth 101" Kelly (AKA Joe Hagstrom). That I called him "nuts" and he only began talking about me behind my back to other bloggers about me being "nuts" in response to me slandering him with the insult first. This is an untruth that Mr. Kelly presented in his shithead post, and is an allegation I absolutely must refute.

Near the end of a commentary on his blog in which he labels me a shithead, he makes the following claim...

Joe Kelly-Hagstrom: But since all this "nuts" thing, which WD actually started long before I called him nuts and I submitted his comment on Will's shitheaded blog as proof, I've had no choice but to identify them as shitheads. None of this is my fault. The only responsibility I bear is deciding who is a shithead and who isn't. (8/28/2013 at 1:35pm). See DSD #29 for a copy of Joe's commenary.

Categorically false. And Joe101 knows it; or should know it. Perhaps he does not remember, but I sure as hell do. In any case, Joe101's statement is not factually accurate, and I can prove it. The comment he speaks of, the one that he submitted to Willis' shitheaded blog as proof, is as follows (Joe101 published it in the comment thread when I asked him what his "proof" was)...

Joe Kelly-Hagstrom: This is the meat of the comment you left calling me a "nut" WD. Further proof you not only started this whole thing, but that you are indeed a shithead. I took no offense. Just WD being WD. But God forbid someone say you're nuts. You big baby. Now quit being a shithead. And you should apologise to me and everyone else for making this conversation, or should I call it now, an intervention as nobody has come to your defense, other than me if you open your shithead eyes. (8/30/2013 at 6:50pm).

What follows is Joe Kelly-Hagstrom quoting me...

Joe Kelly-Hagstrom quoting Dervish Sanders: What kind of a nut shutters his blog (or restricts readership to "invited" readers only), says he can't blog anymore because it gets him in trouble, then opens up his blog for the world to see again? You think those people you got in trouble with won't check to see if your blog is active again? I asked if you could not simply delete the post that "got you in trouble" and you said no. But that looks like you did delete that post (I don't recall what the title was, but I do recall the subject matter... and it does appear to be gone). (Original source for quoted comment 2/22/2012 at 9:08am).

This is Joe101's "proof" that I called him a "nut" first and that I owe him an apology. Trouble is, I remember making that comment, and it was in RESPONSE to him calling me a nut. Actually I heard about this from Willis Hart. He told me on his blog that a Liberal Buddy of mine had contacted him via facebook and said I was nuts.

I wrote a post about this conversation on my blog titled, "w-dervish's Liberal Buddies Told Willis Hart on Facebook that w-dervish Is A Frigging Nut". In response to this post Joe101 said "You're nuts", thereby confirming that he was the person Willis Hart described as the "Liberal Buddy" who told him I was nuts. The date that comment was made was 2/18/2012 (Joe101's is the first comment the post received). The date of the comment (by me on his blog) that Joe101 says is the one that is "proof" I called him a nut first? 2/22/2012.

So, he says the "proof" I called him a nut first is a comment I made on 2/22/2012 which was in reality MY RESPONSE to him calling me a nut on 2/18/2012 (actually this is the date I found out that it was Joe101 who called me a nut behind my back in a conversation with Willis Hart that took place earlier on facebook). As anyone can see 2/18/2012 is a date that occurred BEFORE 2/22/2012. And 2/15/2012 (the date I found out from Willis Hart that Joe101 was calling me a nut in a conversation that took place on Facebook) is earlier still.

As everyone can see, Joe101's claims about who called who a "nut" first are not accurate. So why the hell does he remember that I called him a nut first? And why does he not apologize after I point out to him that he has the dates wrong? Instead he says "You started it with your nuttery". This is his response to my irrefutable proof that he called me a nut first (and that what he says in his post is utter bullshit)?! Why not admit the mistake? I ask again, who the hell would like being called "nuts" or a "shithead"? I'm guessing nobody. But I object and Joe101 says I'm a "big baby"?!

And apparently NOBODY else (as Joe101 pointed out) sees anything wrong with this? Nobody at all, huh? Even after Joe101 called me a nut FIRST I still acted in a friendly manner toward him (so this "big baby" charge is bullcrap). But now (with this "shithead" post), not only does he toss red meat to my detractors (Willis Hart, Dennis Marks, and Lester Nation), but he sits back and enjoys the show as the raving maniac Steve laughs it up. This is, in my strong opinion, the definition of a shithead. As much as it pains me to say it, Joe Kelly (AKA Joe Hagstrom, AKA Truth 101) is a shithead of the highest order. I wonder... does that mean the Republican conversion is complete?

Sequence of events that prove Joe101 is a shithead in regards to his claim that I "started" the insulting by calling him "nuts" first

2/15/2012: Date Willis Hart told me Joe101 was calling me NUTS behind my back on Facebook.

2/18/2012: Date Joe101 called me NUTS on my blog in response to a post I wrote about what Willis Hart told me.

2/22/2012: Date Dervish Sanders called Joe101 "nuts" on Joe101's blog (this is the comment he says "proves" I insulted him first).

SWTD #203

27 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. My point is in bold. It isn't my issue if you have reading comprehension problems.

      Delete


  2. The point is on his head....under the tin foil hat..

    ReplyDelete
  3. The point, or proverbial needle, is to be found in the haystack.

    ReplyDelete
  4. FYI, Rusty... Darth wears a white hood, not a tinfoil hat.

    As for RN's comment... making as much sense as usual... that is, none at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It usually doesn't make sense to pinheads. Pinhead.

      Delete
  5. RN makes no sense and blames others for his word salad. Typical RN pinheaded response.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Surely the word salad tosses forth from the salad forks of you Mr. Sanders. I on the other hand keep things concise.

    I, as everyone can plainly see was blaming no one for anything on his thread. I simply made a statement in response to DB's initial opening comment.

    Mr. Sanders, you seem quite defensive and a bit out of sorts today. May I suggest a shot (or two) and then chilling out dude. Life's too short as it is.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wrong in regards to all your accusations. The statement you "simply" made simply made no sense and I simply pointed that out. If anyone is "quite defensive" or "out of sorts" the guilty individual would be RN. "Concise" to RN must mean not enough words so that anyone knows what the hell he's talking about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course Mr. Sanders. Your misrepresentation of simple truths is quite understandable, given your altered ability to perceive simple realities.

      But fear not Mr. Sanders. It is not your fault.

      Delete
    2. The simple truth is conversing with RN is simply infuriating. No doubt his obtuseness is on purpose to accomplish just this goal.

      I have misrepresented ZERO "simple truths".

      Delete
  8. Excuse me... If I use RN parlance perhaps he will better understand me...

    Did RN just fart?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The stench of RN is in the air. Time to spray some Glade.

      Delete
  9. What's the Scoop on Chicken Poop RN, since you are the Master of Chicken Shit!

    ReplyDelete
  10. DS, just about 99 percent of your Rightwing commentors are "HATERS"

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yuppers wd, whatever your shitheaded delusion cesspool of make believe guides you to accept. It is, after all fine by me. Ya see, you live with yourself, I don't have to. I just get to infuriate you. Something you obviously enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not enjoy RN's shitheadedness. You are done, at least as far as this comment thread is concerned. No more comments from RN will be accepted in regards to this post. As far as other posts go... I ask that RN at least make a feeble attempt to stay on topic... or he won't be published.

      No further comments denigrating this blog from RN will be published PERIOD... not in reply to this post or any other (specifically I refer to comments such as your last one).

      If you can't comply I suggest you go back to YOUR delusional cesspool of make believe... a place you are free to play your little shithead games to your heart's content.

      Now, excuse me while I open the windows and turn on the fans to clear the air of the stench left behind by RN.

      Delete
  12. Lol, noire comments from RN, unless, this, or unless that, or until this, or until that! Get real!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another comment from Darth that illustrates his reading comprehension problem? Not interested.

      Delete
  13. As I am not interested in your stupid monsense

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know what "monsense" is. I'm pretty sure I don't have any though, stupid or smart.

      Delete
  14. Like I care wd. Really, your blog is a mere amusement for me, an oppurtunity to laugh and then infuriate you. I do recall you said having a conversation with me is infuriating. Rest assured it is a one way deal.

    I know you won't publish this, and that is okay. You after all had the opportunity to read my words and get infuriated.

    Have a good weekend Mr. Sanders.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I said I wouldn't publish any more comments from you in this thread that was NOT an invitation for you to submit one more that would be just between you and me.

      I call BS on your claim of this being a "one way deal"... as you were CLEARLY incredibly infuriated in that thread where we were discussing your stupid comments about Jewish Holocaust victims. That was quite evident due to all the "POS" and "ass hat" insults RN was submitting. He must have been refreshing his browser every few minutes to see if there was another comment he could respond to with an "ass hat" or a "POS".

      That was pretty funny. Downside is I'm now stuck with YOUR troll, the clearly mentally unbalanced Steve.

      FYI, future comments meant to "infuriate" may or may not be published. If that happens (you submit an off-topic POS comment and it doesn't show up later) you can assume the reason is I trash-canned it. Serious comments will continue to be published... for the time being.

      Delete
    2. Hm, you published my most astute and accurate prior comment. One can only speculate why.

      Having said the above I only add this, have a marvelous weekend Mr. Sanders. Give my best to your canine as well as your wife or significant other if you have one.

      Sincerely,

      Les Carpenter, CPT
      Fitness, Strength, and Power
      http://lcarpnterfitness.blogspot.com/
      lcarpenterfitness@gmail.com

      Delete
    3. Took a look at your fitness blog, RN. Not much there.

      Delete

Unfortunately comment moderation is necessary in order to screen out insanity from an idiot calling himself "Luke" of the "Words And Music" blog (a liar who has made bogus accusations that many others are stealing his posts) as well as homophobic hate from TOM of the blog "Stay A While" (actually the same person).