Thursday, September 21, 2017

Bill Clinton Predicted Trump Presidency. Then He & Obama Helped Bring It About

Angry people have become the middle of the political spectrum ~ Geert Wilders (dob 9/6/1963) a Dutch nationalist politician and fan of DJT who has been criminally accused of inciting hatred and discrimination.

Progressive Radio host Thom Hartmann has stated his belief many times that "whichever party first reinvents itself successfully will begin winning elections the way the Democrats did in the 1932-1968 era" [1]. The "reinvention" he refers to is to be pro-worker by opposing sending our jobs overseas.

Unfortunately this past potus election has proven that Thom Hartmann was right. I did not disagree, but I did hope that it would be the Democrats who reinvented themselves. The Democratic potus candidate should have been Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders has proven that he is pro-worker by opposing job killing free trade agreements. Bernie Sanders votes against them.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, championed the job killing free trade agreement known as the TPP. This was after suggesting that he might renegotiate NAFTA during his first campaign. Hillary Clinton (viewed by many as a 3rd Obama term) was initially in favor of the TPP. I say that if Bernie had not run that she wouldn't have flipped. She would have run as the pro-TPP candidate.

Trump, an outsider, was the right candidate at the right time. He ran against the TPP, which White Rust Belt Blue-collar voters knew would cost them their jobs. Trump also promised he'd stop brown people (here) and yellow people (overseas) from stealing their jobs (he played the race card). I'm not saying everyone who voted Trump did so because they're racist, but a LOT of them did.

The Trump presidency was, btw, predicted by former president Bill Clinton. He predicted the ascendency of a Trump-like leader with his New Covenant speeches (a series of speeches WJC delivered "at his alma mater, Georgetown University, in late 1991 to outline his political philosophy at the start of his campaign for the presidency").

WJC: ...we're offering a new radical approach to economics. Economics as if people were really important. If we offer these hard-working families no hope for the future, no solutions to their problems, no relief for their pain, then fear and insecurity will grow, and the politics of hate and division will spread. If we do not act to bring this country together in common cause to build a better future, David Duke and his kind will be able to divide and destroy our nation. (Excerpt from then-Governor Clinton's 11/20/1991 New Covenant speech).

Donald Trump offered "hope for the future, solutions to their problems, and relief for their pain" in the form of his rejection of the TPP. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA into law, which is why we got gwb [2]. And Obama and Hillary both spoke favorably of more job-killing free trade. Hillary reversed herself on the TPP, although she was pushed/forced to do so by Bernie Sanders.

Now, most of us know that Donald Trump is a con-man who just said what he needed to in order to get elected. But enough people were fooled. Previously middle class workers (White people in the flyover states, by and large) saw their jobs go overseas due to the Bill Clinton-signed NAFTA. And they feared that it was going to happen again. Obama (for some bizarre reason that baffles my mind) tried to sell the same snake oil [3].

He thought he could ram it though before his administration ended, I guess. Hillary Clinton reversed course because of Bernie Sanders. "I've got to be more like Bernie" she decided (because the voters were responding to Bernie's anti-TPP stance). But the damage was done. Nobody believed her. The White middle class who lost (or could lose) their good paying jobs because of job killing free trade didn't believe her (btw, I thought the bill would pass before the Obama administration came to an end, Obama would sign it into law, HRC would be elected, then she'd put the blame on Obama).

She wanted it, but wouldn't touch it (if she were elected and it had not passed) because it would damage her politically. This is why I blame Obama and I blame both Clintons for the Trump presidency. Trump hijacked the Republican Party and "reinvented" it. Thom Hartmann knew whichever party was first to come out against job killing free trade would win. Bill Clinton PREDICTED what would happen if he failed to offer these workers "relief for their pain". But he went ahead and signed NAFTA anyway.

According to Thom Hartmann, "Donald Trump lead a full-scale war against the Republican establishment and elites, particularly through his attack on both their military and their trade policies". Trump, as president, chucked the TPP. An easy campaign promise to fulfill. The military situation we're in is another story.

He strongly opposed continuing the futile fight in Afghanistan as a candidate. Now he sends more troops? Did that disillusion some of the #trumpdupes? I suspect some were disillusioned. Others will continue to believe that anything Trump does is great. Because he's White. According to the racist blogger Rusty Shackelford.

Rusty Shackelford: Now, now WD... even you would have to admit DJT is so much stronger then the moolie. We are fine with the Pres changing his mind after having all the information presented to him... that's the sign of a strong leader... not a limp wristed dufuss. (8/21/2017 at 9:44pm).

"David Duke and his kind will be able to divide and destroy our nation", Bill Clinton warned. Now it has happened. At the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville David Duke said "the event represented fulfilling the promises of President Trump". He was talking about White racists "taking our country back" after a Black guy got elected president twice.

Regarding Trump's hardcore base, Jamelle Bouie writes (in a 9/1/2017 Slate article) "it's become harder to deny that people support the president not just for being president, but for his core message of White resentment and grievance" (visit the WYD blog and you'll see what I mean).

Bill Clinton both predicted and helped bring this disaster about. His signing of NAFTA and Obama's championing of the TPP lead directly to Trump. Trump was the "white resentment and grievance" candidate. Of course the majority of us realized that Trump was a huge liar and saying whatever he needed to to get elected (except for the racism stuff. Trump IS a racist). This is why he lost the popular vote (the smart people voted for Hillary).

Trump did get rid of the TPP, however. But Bernie Sanders would have done that. Then go on to champion programs to help people harmed by decades of job-killing free trade agreements. Unlike Trump, who wants to kill such programs (the ACA, for example). Additionally Trump wants to hurt poor people by cutting Social Safety net programs drastically and push through enormous tax cuts for the benefit of the wealthy (he's a typical Republican in this regard).

Bernie Sanders should have been the Democratic potus candidate. I'm not saying I think he would have won, only that I KNOW he would have had a better shot. Hillary Clinton was the wrong candidate (even though I'd have liked to see a woman elected president, and YES, I did vote for her). But Bernie Sanders (with his record of opposition against job-killing free trade agreements) was the better candidate. He'd still of had to contend with the Russia meddling. And, instead of misogyny and Clinton-hate, he'd have faced antisemitism and bullshit about him being a Commie who was trying to buy votes with "free stuff".

Bernie Sanders would have won the votes of previously Democratic-voting Rust Belt Blue-collar workers (people who were with him in the primary, but switched to Trump when Bernie didn't secure the nomination). And that, I think, would have made the difference. There would have been no sabotage from James Comey either.

Footnotes
[1] "From 1932 to 1968, the Democratic Party was obviously the majority party. During that time period, the Democrats had won seven out of nine presidential elections, and their agenda gravely affected that undertaken by the Republican Eisenhower administration" (source: Wikipedia/Timeline of modern American conservatism). This period of time is know as the New Deal coalition. As per Wikipedia, "FDR forged a coalition that included the Democratic state party organizations, city machines, labor unions, blue collar workers, minorities (racial, ethnic, sexual and religious), farmers, white Southerners, people on relief, and intellectuals".
[2] "...it was the 1993 fight over the North American Free Trade Agreement that saw the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party stick the knife deep into the back of its longtime ally, organized labor". (Source: How the Democrats Lost Touch on Trade by Thomas Frank. Politico, September/October 2016).
[3] As per a 4/23/2015 CBS News article, "in 2008, then-Sen. Obama ran as a skeptic of free trade agreements and even vowed during the primary to renegotiate NAFTA"... according to the former president "I think that we had a stretch of a couple of decades where, in part because of globalization, you had manufacturing moving to other places in search of low wages, no environmental standards, no labor standards. So trade deals haven't always worked for us".

SWTD #390

Monday, September 04, 2017

Trump Will Be Impeached For Getting A BJ In The White House Oval Office (A Prediction On Which I Will Be Proven Correct, Mark My Words!)

Perjury about a blowjob is not nearly as serious as perjury about a Russian attack on our democracy ~ Laurence Tribe (dob 10/10/1941) a professor of constitutional law at Harvard who has argued before the Supreme Court 36 times (6/11/2017, CNN).

I am predicting that the Russia nonsense will go nowhere. Mueller (if Trump doesn't fire his partisan ass) will find nothing. Because Trump did not collude with Russia (according to Trump and his deluded trumpanzees). Which isn't to say that I think trump won't be impeached. He will. But it will be for receiving oral sex in the Oval Office. Mark my words!

BTW his wife Melania isn't the one who has (or will) blow him in the Oval. According to what I've read, "Melania is fully aware... not bothered [and] was planning on leaving the marriage until Trump's unexpected victory". What she was not bothered by is that Trump has a mistress.

The mistress's name? It's Hope Hicks, and she currently serves as the White House Director of Strategic Communications. Hicks, a 28 year old former model, who previously had no experience or interest in politics. Now she travels everywhere with him. BTW, rumor has it that Melania is also cheating. Her beau is "Henry Siemers, head of security at Tiffany's in Trump Tower".

Despite these rumors not being confirmed, I think we can be fairly certain that they are completely true. A cheater cheats, and Trump is a proven cheater. When he bragged to Billy Bush that he can kiss women without their consent and even sexually assault them (grab them by the privates) just because he is a celebrity, he was married to Melania.

Donald and trophy wife #3 were married the same year (1/22/2005) that he told the Bush cousin that women are mere sex objects to him and he can do whatever he wants to a woman he finds attractive (this was sometime in September of 2005). What woman wouldn't want him, given the fact that he's an alpah male?

Obviously the Trumpster never considered staying loyal to his new (3rd) wife. Cheating, like grabbing pussy, is something he is entitled to. And, if (as a wealthy real estate magnate and reality TV star) he thought he was irresistible to women, why the hell would that change now that he's the most powerful man in the world? In addition to cheating with Hopie AKA "The Hopester" another rumor says "Trump has a regular girlfriend in Florida that he sees at Mar-a-Lago".

So maybe he isn't screwing Hope in the WH oval (or any room in the WH), given the fact that it's a dump, but, really, all that needs to happen is for him to lie about under oath about the extra-marital affair. When Trump was "elected" POTUS he was facing an unpresidented 3500 lawsuits. Some of them have been resolved in the 6 months of his illegitimate predisency, but new ones have been filed.

Get him under oath in regards to ONE of these lawsuits. Then, when the plaintiff's counsel asks him if he's cheated on Melania and he answers "no" (which any cheating man would do)? Then we've got him! The only problem would be that Trump would likely decline to answer and his lawyer would probably object. But a good lawyer could find a way to make the question relevant, I think. Maybe not, but it's worth a try.

Additionally, Trump might testify under oath in regards to the Robert Mueller investigation. Trump declared that he was "100 percent willing" to testify under oath about his conversations with former FBI directer Comey. Trump says Comey's characterization of their conversation was not accurate. "I didn't say that" Trump insisted when Comey testified that the predisent asked for loyalty. Also, "to let Flynn investigation go".

As we all know, Trump has not testified, but that does not mean that he won't be asked to. Trump could be asked to testify about his conversations with Comey, or for some other reason. Although Trump would likely refuse (and no law could compel him to appear before Congress under oath). And we all know he lied about being "100 percent willing". Because DJT is a pathological liar.

Trump will likely actively avoid testifying under oath. In regards to any kind of lawsuit or in regards to the Trump-Russia investigation. But, back before Trump was sworn in and Trump University lawsuit was still active, NBC news reported that "yes, Trump can be compelled to testify". Because "The US Supreme Court settled that question in 1997 when it ruled unanimously that a sexual misconduct lawsuit filed by Paula Jones against President Bill Clinton could proceed".

So, if Trump testifies under oath and lies about his affairs? Then the Republicans (once proof of the affair/affairs is presented), will be obligated to impeach. Because, as we all know, lying under oath about cheating on your spouse is an impeachable offense. Although he might not be removed from office, as the last guy who was impeached for a BJ wasn't. Which is why I think that the plaintiff's lawyer should ask as many questions as possible that Trump might answer with a lie.

Lying about threatening James Comey's job if he did not drop the investigation into Mike Flynn, or lying about his involvement in spinning a lie for Donald Junior (re his answer to an offer to collude with a Russian lawyer re the Russian government's support for candidate Trump) might not be as bad as lying about a BJ, but the argument still could be made that lying under oath is lying under oath. Couldn't it? Also, remember that Trump has a record of lying under oath, so it should be easy to catch him in a lie if he has no choice but to testify.

(Image: DJT smooches his alleged mistress, Hope Hicks).

Honestly, though, I think it's financial crimes that will be Trump's downfall. It's my understanding that Mueller has brought on a lot of people specializing in these kind of crimes. Mueller isn't just looking into collusion. Just as the investigation into Bill Clinton started with White Water, moved on to other things, then finally settled on lying about a BJ, Mueller doesn't have to make his case on collusion.

Not that I think there wasn't collusion (as there was nothing to White Water), only that Mueller can nail Trump on something else. Which I think he will. Looks like it's going to be money-laundering for Russian criminal elements. For which NY AG Eric Schneiderman might file charges. Against Paul Manafort - applying pressure to force him to flip on Trump (SWTD #386). If Manafort flips (because Trump can only pardon him for federally filed charges, not charges filed in NY) it could get really ugly for Trump. Bring on the popcorn.

Video: Ladies Man Leon Phelps (Tim Meadows) welcomes Monica Lewinsky to help take calls about dating at work and phone sex, followed by a call from Linda Tripp (5/8/1999). Note that this is the actual Monica Lewinsky, but not the actual Linda Tripp - who was portrayed by John Goodman (6:33).

SWTD #389

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Donald Trump Is A Racist. Donald Trump Is Evil

And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light ~ The Christian Bible, 2 Corinthians 11:14.

Evil

People have been speculating if Donald John Trump, the 45th person to occupy the White House (as the alleged duly-elected President), is mentally ill. Also, whether or not he could be removed from office due to mental illness (under the 25th amendment). A March 2017 Slate article by Steven Reisner, however, says he isn't mentally ill, but evil.

Stop Saying Donald Trump Is Mentally Ill [article excerpt] If we are to combat Trump, we must understand how he has elevated and manipulated certain American values, like greed and exceptionalism, to undermine so many others, like truth, justice, and the American Constitution.

This is not madness. And the impulsivity, threats, aggression, ridicule, denial of reality, and mobilization of the mob that he used to get there are not symptoms. It is time to call it out for what it is: evil.

Arendt [explains in her book, The Origins of Totalitarianism] that we in the West are susceptible to such evil precisely because we cannot conceive of it. We prefer to believe that people are innately good, and evil is some kind of "fall from grace", an anomaly, a madness perhaps, but one always "explained by comprehensible motives". We are at a loss to confront Trumpism, because his strategy is evil for its own ends, and thus reflects, as Arendt described, "a system of values so radically different from all others, that none of our traditional legal, moral, or common sense utilitarian categories could any longer help us to come to terms with, or judge, or predict their course of action".

The "Arendt" referred to in the article is the Jewish political theorist Johanna Hannah Arendt (10/14/1906 to 12/4/1975) who was born in Russian, emigrated to Germany, and later "escaped from Europe during the Holocaust, becoming an American citizen" in 1950.

Arendt's first major book was titled The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), which traced the roots of Stalinism and Nazism in both antisemitism and imperialism. In it, Arendt argues that totalitarianism was a "novel form of government", different from other forms of tyranny in that it applied terror to subjugate mass populations rather than just political adversaries.

Wikipeida notes that "the book sold out on Amazon in January 2017, as part of a bump in interest in books about totalitarianism around the inauguration of President Donald Trump.

Racist

Following the violence (including one murder by a Hitler admirer using his car) in Charlottesville the predisent blamed "many sides" and did not specifically call out the Alt-Right (whom Bannon's Breitbart is a platform for). "Thank you President Trump for your honesty & courage to tell the truth about #Charlottesville & condemn the leftist terrorists in BLM/Antifa" an extremely pleased David Duke tweeted after Trump walked back his condemnation of White Supremacists.

This would be the condemnation (2 days after his initial "many sides" comment) that he was obviously urged to make by his advisors and did begrudgingly. It did not take him long to go back to blaming "many sides" and the mythical "Alt-Left" in a display of #bothsidesirism that the side that is really to blame loves.

"Hispanics and African Americans have lower average IQs than whites and are more genetically predisposed to commit crimes" Alt-Right leader Richard Spencer. He also "wants America to become a White ethno-centric nation". Despite this, Spencer says the Alt-Right is not racist. Because racism is "irrational hate".

If your hate is "rational" it's A-OK. "They're not racist; it's just that they hold beliefs that members of other ethnicities or religions are inherently inferior and universally hold immutable characteristics that determine their behaviours" (Link).

I doubt Trump believes he is a racist. Yet he clearly is. Self delusion seems to be a trait common among racists. They rarely identify as such. The Imperial Wizard of the KKK says "We don't hate people because of their race, I mean, we're a Christian organization". Evil does not admit that it is evil. That would be a warning to the rest of us and could hamper recruiting. Evil deludes itself into believing that it's good and what it's doing is good and being done for rational reasons (see: the banality of evil, a term coined by Arendt).

Trump's Birtherism, hiring of Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka, love for conspiracy theorist Alex Jones (who believes Israel Planned 9/11), his running for the presidency on a platform of keeping out the evil Muslims and rapist Mexicans (Link)...

Also his call for the police to bash heads to quell violence perpetrated overwhelmingly by Black thugs. I refer to Trump's decision to reverse Obama's move away from the use of private prisons (hellholes where corruption and abuse run rampant), AG Sessions desire for maximum prison sentences, Trump's endorsement of police brutality, lifting of Obama's ban on the sale of military equipment to the cops, pardoning of the Constitutional Rights violating racist Sheriff Joe, etc. The message is that we need to get tough on the criminal minorities.

Given the fact that racism and bigotry are evil (and Trump is a racist and a bigot), the obvious conclusion is that Trump is evil. Does it mean anything specifically that more self-identified White Evangelicals supported Trump (81%) than any past Republican president? It's too soon to know yet if Trump's evil is something more than banal. If Trump's "actions were motivated by a sort of stupidity which was wholly unexceptional" (how Arndt described the evil of Adolf Eichmann) or if there is something else going on (something more in line with the quotation at the top of my post).

Image: Trump smooches Pepe. Other images can be found of Trump as Pepe, Pepe in a red MAGA hat, etc. Pepe is a symbol of the Alt-Right. Trump HIMSELF has re-tweeted a Pepe meme (Pepe as Trump)! It is in his twitter feed (10/13/2015). He hasn't deleted it, proof that he didn't retweet the meme mistakenly, not knowing the meaning of Pepe. This tweet was another shout out to the Alt-Right. Something he did (and continues to do) because Trump supports the Alt-Right. Because Trump is a White Nationalist. Or a fellow traveler at least. This can NOT be denied!

SWTD #388

Friday, August 25, 2017

Predisent Fart aka MAGA Man

...Trump dominates the news cycle the way a fart dominates the interior of a Volkswagen Beetle ~ John Oliver (dob 4/23/1977) host of HBO's Last Week Tonight, 2/20/2017.

Donald Jackass Trump currently serves as the 45th predisent of the United States (although hopefully for not much longer). Note that "predisent" is a misspelling that comes from Trump lawyer Marc Kasowitz. In a lie-filled letter (written in response to former FBI Director James Comey's Senate testimony), Kasowitz introduced himself as "Predisent Trump's personal lawyer" (and this was not the only misspelling contained in the embarrassing document).

I will use this spelling of "president" when referring to the anus-lipped BLOTUS because I refuse to refer to this asshole using a title that denotes respect. When I use this alternate spelling of "president" I intend disrespect. I also, given the fact that the election was stolen, do not recognize him as legitimately installed by We The People. Therefore (my definition) of "predisent" is a CIC who is illegitimate.

Additionally, I will refer to him as "Fart" because, in England, "trump" refers to the passing of gas via the rectum. "Predisent Fart" is appropriately respectful title for a misogynistic, sexual-assaulting, racist, bigoted, White Nationalist enabling, Russia colluding, psycopathic, low IQ, profoundly incompetent reality teevee buffoon, birther, malignant narcissist, pathological liar, fake Christian syphilitic pedophile.

As well as an evil asshole, Alex-Jones-influenced conspiracy theorist, laughably bad spray tanned orange-skinned simpleton with an extremely limited vocabulary (according to the actual author of The Art of the Deal, which Trump likely hasn't even read).

It is also my understanding that MAGA doesn't stand for "Make America Great Again", but "Massive Ass Gas Attack", something Prez Fart (Facebook page) wages against the American people on a daily basis. In that this predisent STINKS. I refer to his presidency as well as the man himself. If you haven't guessed it, I hate his guts. Much more than the doofus that served as the 43rd president, george w. bush. And he is a war criminal!

Image: Predisent Fart passes gas from his rectum.

SWTD #387. See also WYM #10.

Wednesday, August 09, 2017

Man Who Farts In Deep Doo-Doo. Will He Or Flynn Bring Down Trump?

This thing is going into a critical phase. When they start raiding your offices for documents, they think you're lying. They think that you are hiding information ~ Malcolm Nance on the Stephanie Miller Show, 8/9/2017.

According to what I've heard, Trump ex campaign manager Paul Manafort's nickname is "man-who-farts". Due to "his inability to hold them in during meetings". Today it was revealed that (on 7/26/2017) the residence of the Gassy One were raided by the FBI at the direction of Robert Mueller. They were looking for evidence re the investigation into the corrupt Trump administration.

The FBI conducted a pre-dawn raid at the home of President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman ... [Seized] documents are said to include notes Manafort took while attending a meeting with Donald Trump Jr and a Russian lawyer at Trump Tower in June 2016. (FBI Raided Paul Manafort's Home by Inae Oh. Mother Jones 8/9/2017).

So what do those notes say? Do they include dates on which WikiLeaks dumped material stolen by Russian hackers from the DNC? Remember when Hillary Clinton said "The Russians, in my opinion ... could not have known how best to weaponize that information unless they have been guided ... by Americans"?

The popular vote winner of the 2016 POTUS election said "she is leaning in a direction that suggests the two coordinated" (Russia and the Trump campaign). Was it during this meeting that the coordination was discussed? The eponymously named progeny of Trump insists that he was promised dirt on HRC. His response was "I love it". His story is that he was lied to and got no dirt.

The email (from Rob Goldstein) said the requested meeting concerned the Russian government's support for DJT's presidential campaign. Was Goldstone ("a British music publicist and former tabloid journalist" with ties to the Russian oligarch Aras Agalarov) mistaken? The Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya (one of the 5 Reds at the collusion conference) denies any ties to the Russian government. Surely she is telling the truth.

Why was Russian money launderer Irakly Kaveladze also present? Was it to remind Donald Junior how deep his father was in with the Russian mob? "You've been in with us for years, so you better go along to get along". Was that the message that Irakly imparted?

There is no doubt in my mind that Trump is dirty (and likely knew about this meeting). The Russians have been working him for decades, slowly reeling him in. Trump happily accepted their money, selling them Trump properties at inflated prices. "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets... We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia" the Junior Trump said circa 2008.

After shifting through the documents from the man-who-farts, will Mueller have enough dirt on Farty to force him to flip on Trump? Bill Plamer, "an indie journalist who is usually a step or two ahead on Trump-Russia coverage" says "Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort may go to prison over Donald Trump Jr's Russia meeting after all".

Kushner initially lied about all of his Russia meetings on his SF-86 security clearance form, which is an imprisonable felony. Once that fact was exposed earlier this summer, he went back and listed hundreds of foreign meetings, including the one he attended with Donald Trump Jr and Russia. Manafort has been trying to get himself out from under his own failure to register as a paid foreign agent of the Kremlin, and has also confessed to Trump Jr's meeting. But if their "confessions" omitted the fact that a Russian spy like Rinat Akhmetshin was also in the meeting, then it means they blew their last shot at trying to avoid prison. (7/14/2017 Palmer Report article).

According to Wikipedia Rinat Akhmetshin is a "former Soviet counterintelligence officer". Meaning she worked for the FSB (the Federal Security Service, which is the principal security agency of Russia). This is the organization previously known as the KGB. Back in December of 2016 Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner met with Russian Sergey Gorkov. Gorkov chairs the state-owned Vnesheconombank (VEB), although he is a graduate of the academy that trains FSB agents (he was appointed to his current position by Putin).

It was also during this time period (the transition from the Obama to the Trump administration) that Kushner met with senior diplomat Sergey Kislyak to discuss setting up back-channel communications with Russia. "Back-channel talks have been common in US diplomacy". "Obama did it" is their defense. But the US has one president and one administration at a time. Kushner's back-channeling with Russia occurred before Trump was inaugurated and not something he should have been doing.

Meeting with Kislyak and failing to disclose it, BTW, was the reason Flynn was fired. But Kushner met with Sergey Kislyak and Natalia Veselnitskaya and didn't disclose. His lawyers say it was a "mistake". Later he amended his security clearance form to include the Kislyak meeting, but not the Veselnitskaya meeting.

I guess he "forgot". Because the meeting between him, Farty and Don Junior didn't result in them getting the HRC dirt that Veselnitskaya promised (as part of the Russian government's support for his father's presidential campaign). So they (Kushner and DJT#2) SAY. But Kushner is a liar. Kushner also met with the VEB chair Sergey Gorkov and fibbed about the why. VEB, BTW, "is not actually a bank at all [but more like] a slush fund for Russian President Vladimir Putin".

VEB says the meeting with Kushner had to do with "his family's real estate business" (re him "seeking financing for its troubled $1.8 billion purchase of an office building on Fifth Avenue in NY"), but Trump's White House "says the meeting was unrelated to business and was one of many diplomatic encounters".

However, as I noted earlier, VEB isn't a bank, so why would they be financing Kushner? Also, the "bank" has sanctions on it and Americans aren't supposed to be doing business with it. This being a "diplomatic encounter" does not pass the smell test as far as I'm concerned, Gorkov not being a diplomat. Clearly the Trump administration lied.

So what's really going on? I have my suspicions. Suspicions that involve things like collusion to spread fake news via social media designed to swing the election to DJT. And DJT being "persuaded" to collude due to his decades long involvement in Russian money laundering. All we can do now is wait and see if Mueller is able to uncover the necessary evidence. If he is allowed to, I think he should be able to.

Then we'll see if the Republicans are willing to impeach. Although, even if there is overwhelming evidence, trumpanzees have indicated they will not believe it. According to these brainwashed rubes (and the fake news Trump ass lickers manipulating them) Mueller is busy fabricating evidence.

WikiLeaks asshole Julian Assange recently tweeted (8/4/2017) "Is Robert Mueller a dirty cop?". I've noticed several new "news" outlets that, as soon as an outrageous and absurd lie escapes the orange anus lips of the BLOTUS, release articles backing up his nonsense. The Horn News and The Real News Network are two I'd never heard of before (although both say they existed before Trump). Trump himself (people close to him acting with his approval) has launched Real News of the Week from Trump Tower. The sycophantic bullshit (half truths, lies, taking credit for Obama accomplishments) is viewable on the BLOTUS Facebook page.

If Republicans admit that whatever Mueller uncovers has any validity (unless he SOMEHOW clears Trump), trumpanzees will LOSE THEIR SHIT! Knowing this, will Congressional Republicans act? I seriously do not know. I would ask "how could they not", but I was surprised by Trump's "win". So I'm not making any predictions regarding impeachment.

Paul Manafort, while he acted as an agent of a foreign power, never registered as one. Farty engaged in "lavishly-compensated work for a pro-Russian Ukrainian political party". My guess would be that Farty did not care that he was committing a felony due to the 17 million large he was gifted (Michael Flynn broke the same law when he did consulting work for the Turkish government. Although his "consulting" included discussing an illegal kidnapping of a Turkish cleric living in PA. Likely to be imprisoned and tortured).

By the way, did you know that in England the BLOTUS is known as "Donald Fart"? The reason is that, in Britain, the word "trump" is "slang for noisy flatulence". The man-who-farts and Donald Fart teamed up to assault America (with the help of Russia) via a nasty and vile Massive Ass Gas Attack. #MAGA!

Now, due to Trump's incompetence, potentially millions of lives are threatened with nuclear annihilation. Fucking trumpanzees! Their idiocy could destroy the world as we know it (God's will if it happens according to an evangelical Trumper). This incompetent buffoon has GOT to go!

SWTD #386

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Donald Trump Is An Evil Asshole (Thoughts On The Defeat Of TrumpCare, So Called Skinny Repeal & The GOP's Bloodthirsty Desire To Murder People By Taking Away Their Insurance)

Insurers say if Trump follows through with his threats it will "throw markets into turmoil and even cause the type of death spiral Republicans in Congress have long warned against".

The ACA will not fail unless predisent Trump sabotages it. With this tweet he announces his intention to do just that. Yet he will still claim that ObamaCare "imploded" after entering a (Republican caused) death spiral. Because Trump is a dissembling POS with a loyal following of fanatical, moronic, brainwashed rubes eager to believe his lies (i.e. the Trump-aligned Right's "fake news" and "deep state" bullshit).

Barack Obama warned us that Trump is uniquely unqualified. "All the progress we've made these last 8 years goes out the window if we don't win this election" the former president said 5 days before a reality TV show buffon was "elected" (by losing the popular vote). With the help of Kris Kobach and Vladimir Putin.

According to the opening dialogue of Comedy Central's The President Show, Donald Trump is the "45th and FINAL president". Obviously a joke, although one that could turn out to be an accurate prediction. IMO the longer this pathetic, racist, misogynist, narcissistic, low IQ, evil, bullying butthole is allowed to remain president the greater the chance.

Yertle the Turtle (Mitch McConnell) and Eddie Munster (Paul Ryan) would have moved on already if not for (what Bob Cesca refers to as) Trump's "idiot strength" (he is too dumb to know when to give up). Trump has outright violated or blatantly ignored other campaign promises, yet this one is important for him to keep. Likely because the ACA is known by the stupider of his adherents only as "ObamaCare" (they are unaware that the ACA and ObamaCare are the same thing). Everything "Obama" must be destroyed.

Eddie has big plans to cause great suffering among the rabble. Plans he has been salivating to implement for decades (Paul Ryan Says He's Been Dreaming Of Cutting Medicaid Since He Was In College). I'm not sure what Yertle's deal is. I'm sure he hates Obama, though not as irrationally as Trump hates him.

Most Congressional Republicans were (and still are) clearly onboard with the bloodthirsty plan to murder Americans by making their health care insurance more unaffordable. I have to wonder what lies they would have spun if their legislation had passed and that inevitably happened. Given the fact that they said their motivation was to bring DOWN health insurance costs. It boggles the mind.

Perhaps they are convinced that Trump's sham Election Integrity Commission means they no longer have to answer to the voters. Trump told us the election was going to be rigged (SWTD #355). Now, as predisent, Trump has tasked Kobach with increasing the rigging of future elections (eliminate even more minorities via Crosscheck). Suppress enough votes and Republicans will win every election going forward. Dead people (despite Republican fantasies) also do not vote.

SWTD #385

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Pervert-In-Chief Regals Young Boys With Tale Of Rich Man Who Had Lots Of Yacht Sex

Look at those hands, are they small hands? And, if they're small, something else must be small. I guarantee you there's no problem. I guarantee ~ Candidate Trump talking about the size of his penis, 3/3/2016.

Pervert-In-Chief Donald Trump visited the Boys Scouts during their 2017 National Scout Jamboree (7/19/2017 to 7/28/2017 at the Summit Bechtel Reserve WV). BLOTUS, (in a speech delivered on the 23rd) rambled on about his "win" and got the audience to boo ex-president Obama, even though "every other president to speak at the Scout Jamboree in its 80 years of existence addressed purely nonpartisan themes".

An official for the Scouts later issued an apology. I presume because some of the parents were Democrats who did not appreciate Trump's bragging about his win yet again. Heck, even some Republicans must find this moron's fixation on "winning" tiring. Given the fact that all past presidents focused on actually doing the job ofter they got it. As opposed to bragging about "winning" the Electoral College (when he cheated). And lying about winning the popular vote.

Additionally (and inappropriately) Trump regaled the young boys with a tale of a rich man who sold his business for a lot of money... then bought a yacht on which he had lots of sex.

Real estate developer William Levitt built affordable houses on Long Island for returning vets following WWII. According to Slate, Levittown (name of the development) was "notorious for its refusal to accept applications from anyone other than whites".

Trump also (when he worked with his father circa 1973) discriminated against minorities. "Get rid of Blacks" Fred Trump told his 27-year-old son (re African Americans who were seeking to and already renting Trump apartments).

Although the racist BLOTUS skipped that part. The point of the story was that if you become successful you can get rich and buy a yacht. Then (presumably) what you do is invite women to join you on your yacht. Then you grab the bitches you lure onto your yacht by the pussy and otherwise sex them up.

Trump got away with telling this inappropriate story (I guess) because he didn't spell out what he was talking about. But people can read between the lines. The disgusting pervert thinks banging as many hot chicks as you can is just what you do if you're a rich Man. And the 12-year-old Scouts he was addressing knew it. "You know life" Trump remarked.

"The president was met with uproarious howling and applause, so the kids clearly knew what he was talking about and were down to hear about a millionaire's carnal fuck spree"... Maggie Serota of Death and Taxes wrote. "There was so much sucking and fucking on that yacht, believe me. Playboy bunnies, bowls full of coke... bowls! You know. You know life"... Samantha Bee said, rephrasing Trump's anecdote on the 7/26/2017 airing of her Full Frontal TBS program.

So why only an apology for talking politics? Where is the apology from the leadership of the Scouts for allowing a sexual deviant to warp the minds of young boys?

SWTD #384

Saturday, July 22, 2017

Donald Trump Colluded With The Devil To Get Elected Predisent

The question has changed now. It's no longer "was there collusion?", it's now "how much collusion was there?" ~ Trevor Noah of the Daily show, re the email chain discussing the Russian government's support for Trump winning the presidency, 7/11/2017.

In addition to colluding with Russia, DJT also colluded with Satan to win the predisency. "Predisent", not being a misspelling of "president", but an alternate spelling of the word that means the president is illegitimate (I assume).

As for DJT colluding with Old Scratch, Trump's drunk TV wife (as per Stephanie Miller), Jeanine Pirro (someone who ran for office 5 times herself) said (on her Fox Nooz program "Justice with Judge Jeanine") "if the Devil called me and said he wanted to set up a meeting to give me opposition research on my opponent - I'd be on the first trolley to Hell to get it".

This was in regards to Trump Jr. taking a meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya (and 4 other Russians, including money launderer Irakly Kaveladze) because she said (via email) that she had dirt on HRC. "I love it" DJT Jr replied.

"...any politician who tells you otherwise is a bald faced liar" Pirro added, dismissing the "Trump Russia collusion" allegations. Although this is patently false. John F. Kennedy rebuffed Nikita Khrushchev's offer of help (to defeat Nixon) when "Russian operatives... attempted to contact Kennedy campaign officials during the 1960 election" (Why Russian Officials Tried to Help John F. Kennedy Win the Presidency).

Additionally, when someone sent the Al Gore campaign "a videotape of George W. Bush rehearsing for the upcoming debate", Thomas Downey (person who was playing gwb in debate practice opposite Gore and individual to whom the VHS was sent), immediately (as soon as he realized what was on the tape) turned it over to the FBI (Someone Gave Al Gore "Dirt" On George Bush. Here's What His Campaign Did).

Trump Jr, on the other hand, in response to an email with the subject line "Russia - Clinton - Private and Confidential", agreed to take the meeting. Even though the email (sent by Rob Goldstone, an English publicist who manages the career of singer-songwriter Emin Agalarov, the son of Russian oligarch Aras Agalarov) stated that the info was being provided as "part of Russia and it's government's support for Mr. Trump" (Donald Trump Jr. releases email chain on his Russian meeting).

So what if Natalia Veselnitskaya didn't actually provide the dirt on HRC that was mentioned in the email (if she didn't, and I'm certainly not taking her, or DJT Jr's word for it)? If Don Jr had responded to an email promising sex with an underage girl, but when he got to the meeting he encountered Chris Hansen instead, would we accept a claim from him that no crime was committed? What is important is that Trump Jr. INTENDED to collude. "I love it" he said!

And, YES, the meeting violated campaign finance law, as Trump Jr. INTENDED to accept a "contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation". The "other thing of value" being info damaging to HRC's campaign (Watchdogs to DOJ: Trump Jr. meeting broke campaign finance laws).

BTW, as per Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks, it "sure looks like Trump knew his son was meeting with Russians".

Trump Jr, who took Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner with him to the meeting, insists that his father was unaware of the meeting until recently. Sure, that's believable. Not. How much collusion was there? IMO there was a LOT.

Remember that money launderer Irakly Kaveladze was at the Don Jr. meeting? Apparently special prosecutor Robert Mueller is looking into Trump's finances (Confirmed: subpoenas have been sent to banks regarding Donald Trump and money laundering).

Trump Sr, who, due to his many bankruptcies, could no longer obtain loans from US banks, turned to Russia to keep his empire afloat. Russian oligarchs and mobsters told Trump they'd loan him what he needed - if he'd launder their dirty money. Launding the Russians accomplished by overpaying for Trump properties (With Trump and Russia, it's all about the money).

This, I suspect, is how Muller will bring down Trump. Explaining why Trump indicated that Muller looking into his finances might be something he would not tolerate. Doing so would "be a violation of what the investigation was supposed to focus on" Trump told the NYT (Trump says Mueller could cross a "red line" by digging into his finances — and he now appears to be doing just that).

On the other hand, Trump may be colluding with The Devil and Satan will come to Trump's aide (somehow preventing an impeachment). Bottom line here - if colluding with Lucifer was an option - you KNOW Trump would do it. Jeanine Pirro clearly thinks it would be great.

"Those who supported Republican candidates in recent elections, such as white born-again or evangelical Christians and white Catholics, strongly supported Donald Trump" PEW reports. A fact (I suspect) which caused Satan to smile broadly at his successful deception (convincing supposed Christians to vote for the Antichrist).

SWTD #383

Friday, July 14, 2017

The Rube Show, As Presented By The Carnival Barker Predisent

"I am Marc Kasowitz, Predisent Trump's personal lawyer", the 45th illegitimate sexual-assaulter-in-chief's very own ambulance chaser wrote following ex-FBI directer James Comey's testimony on 6/8/2017 (misspelling "president").

The gist of Kasowitz's written statement was that Comey is a liar and the Trumpster never asked Comey for loyalty. Trump also denied he asked Comey to drop the investigation into Flynn's lawbreaking. Although he insisted it would have been OK if he had.

Just like he never told Flynn to talk to the Russians - although it would have been OK if he had. How dumb does Trump think we are? Correction - Trump KNOWS his followers are dumb ("I love the poorly educated"). The rest of us know he's LYING!

And how stupid is it to run an entire administration with a primary goal of keeping things going by lying to the hardcore base and NOT CARING that everyone else knows you're lying about so many things! The Trump administration is what you'd expect from an ex-reality Teevee star. One who is OBVIOUSLY still practicing his craft! That craft being pulling the wool over the eyes of gullible rubes.

Last month, President Trump visited Saudi Arabia and his administration announced that he had concluded a $110 billion arms deal with the kingdom. Only problem is that there is no deal. ... There is no $110 billion deal. Instead, there are a bunch of letters of interest or intent, but not contracts. Many are offers that the defense industry thinks the Saudis will be interested in someday. So far nothing has been notified to the Senate for review. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the arms sales wing of the Pentagon, calls them "intended sales". None of the deals identified so far are new, all began in the Obama administration. (The $110 billion arms deal to Saudi Arabia is fake news by Bruce Riedel. Brookings 6/5/2017.).

Here is a picture of Trump and a Saudi ally signing the non-deal.

Remember that Saudi Arabia is the country that supplied most of the 9/11 hijackers and that Saudi Arabia sponsors terror. But Trump (displaying his cowardice) didn't discuss "radical Islam" while there, instead calling Islam "one of the world's great faiths". This despite the fact that he previously stated "I think Islam hates us". Remember that Trump's travel ban was made to play to his base's fear (there is no purpose for it except to fulfill a campaign promise made because the stupid and hateful rubes want it).

But yet this fake deal garners little-to-no outrage. Instead the Orange One's Press Secretary (Spicer) sez the trip "was a historic turning point that people will be talking about for many years to come". What a bunch of over-the-top laughably ridiculous bullplop. But it's JUST the kind of bullplop that the rubes love, apparently.

Another recent Trump lie concerns his desire to bigly cut taxes on wealthy people like himself (the one he issued a one page outline regarding). On 6/1/2017 Trump said "Our tax bill is moving along in Congress, and I believe it's doing very well. I think a lot of people will be very pleasantly surprised". This despite the fact that (so far) there is no bill.

It does not exist. They haven't begun writing it. All they know is that they want to cut taxes bigley to the benefit of (primarily) the wealthy. And cut programs that benefit working people. That being their primary objective (TrumpCare being more of a tax cut bill than a health care bill).

Trump, I believe, knows he is lying. At least as far as these fake accomplishments go. But he simply does not care. Maybe he thinks that (if he has people believing things are happening before they actually do) that it will make it easier to accomplish them? Positive group-thinking will move the ball forward faster than if the Rubes are aware of the actual difficulties? Perhaps (although I'm convinced that feeding his enormous ego is also a significant factor). But that does not change the fact that it's a con.

A show for the Rubes to fool them into thinking the Trump presidency is going fantastically. Even though Trump's bogus accomplishments are fake news. But that might not be a bad thing. If only the most radicalized and deluded of the Orange carnival barker's base continue to believe his lies (no matter what), other Trump voters should eventually wake up to the fact that he's failing to deliver when it comes to his campaign promises (weakened Muslim ban, no Wall, no repeal and replace of ObamaCare with "something fantastic", etc).

And, if he isn't actually #MAGA, but only putting on a show, then the damage done by this for-the-rich/by-the-rich administration and Congress will be minimized. Hopefully.

On the other hand, the mean and idiotic TrumpCare legislation won't die. It still has a chance of being passed, in fact. And taking away healthcare insurance from many Trump supporters. Will they finally get that they've been lied to if that happens?

BTW, that TrumpCare is MEAN was not a criticism by the preznit of the GOP legislation that will result in 23 million losing their insurance, but a compliment. This I know because he has also suggested that, if TrumpCare cannot be passed, that 32 million people should lose their insurance (what would happen if ObamaCare were repealed and replaced with nothing. Which the preznit has suggested doing).

Video: Neal Brennan's take [appearing on the 7/12/2017 airing of The Daily Show] re Trump and Congressional Republicans accomplishing none/very little of their agenda is that they are "resisting" themselves.

SWTD #382

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Thoughts On The Patriot Reality Winner, The Seth Rich Murder Conspiracy Theory, The Asshole Julian Assange & The Inevitable Trump Impeachment

Nance's Law of Intelligence Kismet: Coincidence Takes a Lot of Planning! ~ Malcolm Nance via Twitter, 4/1/2017.

First, is Reality Winner a cool name or what? Unfortunately for Ms. Winner it looks like she is going to prison for several years. She appears to be another Edward Snowden, except on a lesser scale. In that she leaked far fewer documents and also did not flee. But she might not have been expecting to get caught.

Which she might not have been, except that the Intercept (Glenn Greenwald news organization) gave her up. According to what I've read, they turned over the document she sent them, and from that the authorities were able to determine that she physically printed it out and mailed it to the Intercept. The authorities, upon further examining the document, determined the serial number of the printer it was generated using.

Because "recent model color printers automatically leave a unique stamp on the documents they produce". Which made it easy to determine it was her. Seems to me that the Intercept did a crappy job of protecting its source.

One thing going on post revelation of Winner as the leaker is Julian Assange (dick who assisted Putin because of their mutual hate for Hillary Clinton) saying Reality "must be supported". Concerning Winner, Assange tweeted "she is a young woman accused of courage in trying to help us know". WTF is he talking about? According to Assange, it was Seth Rich who gave them the documents and Russia was not involved!

On Dutch television in August 2016, Assange hinted that Rich, not Russia, may have been the source for the WikiLeaks emails. "Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, and often very significant risks", he said. "As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington" [knows].

"Was he [Seth Rich] one of your sources then?" the anchor asked. "We don't comment on who our sources are", Assange replied. "Then why make the suggestion about a young guy being shot in the streets of Washington?" the anchor replied. Pressed repeatedly for clarification, Assange concluded that "others, others have suggested that". (The bonkers Seth Rich conspiracy theory, explained by Jeff Guo. Vox 5/24/2017).

"Others" have suggested that?! YOU just suggested it was Seth Rich! If you think describing someone without using their name - while leaving absolutely no doubt whatsoever who it is you're talking about - is "suggesting". Which I absolutely do. What an asshole. To suggest that Seth Rich was the source of the documents (thus fueling conspiracy theory nuts like Willis Hart) when he knows the documents did not come from Rich.

"He was so upset", a person who was very close to Rich said on the condition of anonymity for fear of being targeted by cyberbullies and conspiracy theorists. "It was crazy. Especially for Seth. He said, 'Oh, my God. We have a foreign entity trying to get involved in our elections?' That made him so angry". (Seth Rich wasn't just another D.C. murder victim. He was a meme in the weirdest presidential election of our times by Manuel Roig-Franzia. The Washington Post 1/18/2017).

Maybe Seth Rich was actually not "so upset" but "so relieved" that the DNC was blaming Russia for the theft of it's data instead of him? Or maybe this "person who was very close" to Rich is make-believe, as the Donald tweeted on 5/28/2017 (Whenever you see the words 'sources say' in the fake news media, and they don't mention names... it is very possible that those sources don't exist but are made up by fake news writers).

Either many of the our largest news organizations (excepting Fox) plus all our intelligence agencies are lying, or there IS something to the "Trump Russia narrative". If not it must be a complete coincidence that so many of Trump's campaign operatives had contacts with Russia prior to his taking office - and they all "forgot" to mention those contacts in their security clearance paperwork.

Me, I think it's much more likely that "coordination may have taken place... between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives" (US officials: Info suggests Trump associates may have coordinated with Russians) and that it's only a matter of time before Special counsel Robert Mueller's team uncovers impeachable offences.

Especially given that "Mueller is expected to take an expansive view of his role". It's like when Bill Clinton was investigated for Whitewater and (eventually) impeached for a BJ (lying about consensual sex with an intern). If Mueller is casting a wide net I will be shocked if nothing is uncovered. Unless Trump (or Congressional Republicans) stop Muller, I except Trump will be impeached for coordination with Russia. Or maybe it will be for money laundering. Or maybe for something else.

Anyway, while the document leaked by Reality Winner adds to our understanding of the bigger picture, it obviously will not significant when it comes to Trump's (hopeful) inevitable downfall. So, while I agree with her that his is a "soulless ginger orangutan", I do wonder why she'd throw away her life when the odds of Trump going down are (with or without the document) at least in the moderate range.

I'm not counting any chickens before they hatch, but Malcolm Nance says "Trump's got a million things to be impeached on". Impeachment might not be inevitable, especially if Democrats don't take back at least one of the Houses of Congress in 2018.

Or Trump's offenses and crimes might become so obvious that Republicans decide they are better off with Pence. Me, I'm hoping that Trump ends up humiliated and broken and that a weakened Republican Party cannot accomplish anything in however long they have left with complete power. And then a Democratic majority (presidency and Congress) is elected in 2020 (a Progressive Democrat as President would be awesome).

If not we are likely totally f*cked. Given that Paul Ryan (God forbid he ends up president) wants to finish the transformation of the US into a plutocracy. Whatever happens I think we're going to have to go through some rough shit before there is any hope of seeing light at the other end.

800×734

SWTD #381

Saturday, May 27, 2017

I Want Donald J. Trump Dead. Either By Natural Causes Or Assassination. Whatever It Takes To Remove Him From The Presidency

Obama, he's a piece of shit. I told him to suck on my machine gun ~ Ted Nugent (dob 12/13/1948) quote from a "a vicious onstage rant" during an August 2007 concert.

Just so you know, the post title is intentionally hyperbolic. I'd be OK with any method by which DJT was removed from office. Resignation, impeachment or removal via the 25th amendment would be preferable. I'd even be OK with him returning to his lavish lifestyle. Afterwhich he might divorce Melania and marry a 4th trophy wife.

It would make me extremely happy if he exited the presidency humiliated and (somehow) financially ruined. Or better yet, tried and sent to prison. Due to him violating the Logan act, being a traitor by colluding with Russia, obstructing justice, or in regards to past or ongoing criminal activity.

Point is, I am not wishing him death. Or calling for his death. Death would, in fact be the last thing I'd like to see in DJT's immediate future. I'd MUCH rather see him humiliated and ruined. Even if he does not end up in prison. Which is unlikely for many reasons (a pardon from a president Pence being one). But, given the fact that it will be up to Republicans to initiate removal under the Constitution (and they might be completely unwilling no matter what), I'd be perfectly OK with him being removed via death.

I mean, we know know that Republicans were aware of the Trump/Putin connection prior to the election! "House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told fellow Republicans in a private meeting last year that he thinks Russian President Vladimir Putin pays Donald Trump"... as per audio tape and the Washington Post. Although McCarthey says it was a "joke". Sure.

So the chances of Republicans getting behind impeachment might be slim. Which is why I would be OK with getting Trump out of office by either assassination or a "natural causes" croaking. Surely I would not cry. According to the troll Luke/Steve (suggested on WYD in a deleted thread) I should be the one to take out Trump. Because I am "a sad, useless person who could be sacrificed for the cause". I pointed out to him that threatening the President of the United States is a class E felony (although that didn't stop Ted Nugent, who recently visited the White House).

But it is NOT going to be me. I do not believe I could outsmart the Secret Service. Even if I were willing to sacrifice myself to get rid of Trump. I would likely fail. That's IF I had a desire or ability to try. Which I DO NOT. Although it might be better that a White guy (which I am) did it. As opposed to a Muslim or Mexican. That might result in Trump's travel ban being permanent or his wall being built. By president Pence, perhaps.

In regards to assassination, a commenter on Quora says "if past is prologue, about 1 in 4 that he will be killed, injured or narrowly escape an assassination attempt. There is a 90% chance that at least one attempt will be made, since one attempt has been made on 9 of the last 10 Presidents".

But even if an attempt is made, it does not mean it will be successful. Death by natural causes might actually be the best resolution that can be hoped for. If collusion with Russia leads to impeachment and removal from office - you KNOW his supporters will never accept it. No matter the proof uncovered, it will be "fake news" as far as they are concerned.

Death by natural cause could raise concerns of foul play. Remember that Justice Scalia was "murdered"? But the nuts will believe what they want to believe. Trump's doctor Harold Bornstein claimed that Trump would be (if elected) the "healthiest president in history". Obvious bullplop.

A blog post from The Hill says "depending on what medical records are considered, the president is either overweight or obese. Weighing in at 236 pounds, he is the third heaviest president, behind William Howard Taft and Grover Cleveland. Trump is not a believer in exercise and his diet is considered less than healthy, by many experts".

CNN Politics reports that "other than golf, he considers exercise misguided. Apparently Trump believes "the human body is like a battery, with a finite amount of energy, which exercise only depletes". Of course people who aren't weirdos know this theory is idiotic.

Trump is also the oldest person to ever become president. Ronald Reagan was 69 at beginning of his first term. Trump was 70 upon inauguration. Many people believe he suffers from dementia. I agree that dementia could be an explanation. Raw Story believes "Trump's speech deterioration could be a sign of early dementia".

Although, the man who authored The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, says "Trump has a 200-word vocabulary". This is an assessment Schwartz reached after working with the Donald (in preparation to ghostwrite his book) in 1987 (30 years ago).

A Trump presidency is a danger to the world and he MUST go. Which is why I'm OK with whatever it takes to remove him from office. Excepting any method that changes us from a democracy to some other form of government (a military coup, for example). Also, I would not want Madonna to blow up the White House (a lot of innocent people would die). Other than that? Whatever it takes. The incompetent Orange Buffoon has GOT to go. The sooner the better.

BTW, as much as I hated gwb (and I hated him a LOT), I never entertained such thoughts for a sustained period of time (assassination or death by natural causes). I thought he should be impeached for lying us into 2 illegal wars, but I did not seriously think it would happen. Unlike with Trump. Impeachment looks like a real possibility. Trump is clearly way in over his head. He is the most unqualified person EVER to assume the presidency.

Anyway, I am not calling for, or hoping that Trump be assassinated. I'm only saying that I wouldn't give a shit if he were. Unlike Trump, who did suggest that Hillary should be assassinated if she were to win. If gwb had been assassinated I would have agreed that it was a national tragedy (a president, any president being murdered). As opposed to possibly a good thing in the case of Trump.

Video: Insane man (or actor playing a character) Alex Jones says the CIA & Obama are plotting the assassination of Trump, 12/11/2016 (2:50).

SWTD #380

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Tuesday Afternoon Massacre (Countdown To Trump Impeachment)

If no special prosecutor is appointed, everyone is going to suspect coverup ~ Chuck Schumer on the firing of Comey.

America's reality show preznit Donald Trump to James Comey: "you're fired". John Podesta (HRC's campaign manager) via tweet following the firing: "didn't you know you're supposed to wait til Saturday night to massacre people investigating you?".

The "Saturday Night Massacre" was one of the most dramatic turns of events in the Watergate scandal - the political drama that rocked the United States in the 1970s and led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. President Nixon and the Attorney General's office were locked in a political standoff over Nixon's refusal to comply with orders to release recordings of White House conversations. Nixon ordered the firing of Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox. But Attorney General Elliot Richardson and his deputy William Ruckelshaus resigned rather than comply with the order. Cox was eventually fired by the US solicitor general.

Critics of President Trump's firing of FBI director James Comey see similarities between Cox's firing decades ago and Trump's action on Tuesday. The Trump administration, critics say, is trying to undermine the FBI's investigation into allegations of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, just as Nixon tried to stop lawmakers from learning the truth about his role in the Watergate scandal. (Comey firing draws comparisons to Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre" by Joe Sterling. CNN, 5/10/2017).

So, are we going to get a special prosecutor now and will investigations into Trump lead to his resignation or impeachment? BTW, Trump cited Jeff Sessions as recommending the firing. Huh. I thought Sessions said he'd recuse himself in regards to the Trump/Russia investigation (due to his being caught lying to Senator Franken about his own Russia connections). Then he tells Trump to fire the head guy investigating his campaign?

"While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation" Trump's letter to Comey informing him of the firing reads - a claim that is complete BS. According to The Washington Post, "speaking to reporters Tuesday evening, [White House Press Secretary] Spicer said he did not know what the three occasions were when Comey told Trump that he wasn't under investigation". That's because it never happened.

BTW, according to Fox Nooz, Comey "resigned". Malcolm Nance (on the 5/10/2017 of the Stephanie Miller Show) said 2 names being floated as Comey replacements include Rudy Giuliani (who has also been linked to Russia) and Sheriff Clarke (RW hero who allowed a prisoner to be murdered by guards in his jail).

Two individuals who will be certain to pick up shut down the Trump/Russia investigation. Time for a special prosecutor.

1200×727

See also: [RNUSA] Trump Fires Comey [5/9/2017]. RN writes "Are Trump's true motives obvious on this? or is it just me?"... No it is not just you. As per the Washington Post "Trump has given every reason for us to believe he fired Comey over the Russia investigation". BTW, as per the former MI6 agent Christopher Steele dossier, there exists "records of payments from the Trump campaign to banks of Russian cyber trolls tasked with spreading disinformation ahead of the 2016 election".

5/16/2017 Update: From the NYT... "President Trump asked the FBI director, James B. Comey, to shut down the federal investigation into Mr. Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, in an Oval Office meeting in February, according to a memo Mr. Comey wrote shortly after the meeting. I hope you can let this go, the president told Mr. Comey, according to the memo". Comey didn't let it go and got fired. Isn't this obstruction of justice and an impeachable offense? Time for Congressional Democrats to shut down Congress until we get a special prosecutor, IMO.

5/19/2017 Update: Trump to Russian officials, admitting (again) obstruction of justice: "I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off".

#TrumpRussiaCollusion, #TrumpRussia, #ImpeachTrump.

SWTD #379