Will the Taylor Swift endorsement help? Perhaps a lot of young Taylor Swift fans will push him over the top and he will defeat the horrible Marsha Blackburn. According to Blackburn's ad, Bredesen is against building tRump's idiotic wall, which is why you should vote for her. Even though the wall (as described by tRump during the campaign) will NEVER be built (a solid unbroken contiguous barrier build of solid material i.e. not a fence or series of walls not connected to each other unbroken from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific ocean).
Bredesen is against building the wall. The commercial plays audio of Bredesen saying he doesn't think the wall is the answer. Then the audio rewinds and plays again. Because you should be SHOCKED that he would say such a thing. But only if you are a stupid trumper rube would you think this wall is a good idea.
Bredesen is smart for opposing the wall. But he is not smart for weighing in on the Kavanaugh nomination. Why say anything? But he said he'd have voted for blackout Brett. As per his campaign ads, his strategy is obviously to appeal to republican voters. Bredesen is a former Democratic governor of TN. While governor he addressed budget concerns by kicking people off Tennessee's health care program (TNcare). He also opposed the ACA.
Although this might be what he feels he needs to do in order to win an election in RED Tennessee (and he is likely correct. Still WHY say he would vote for Brett?). All the republican nominees (for the House as well as other state offices) ran ads trying to out-tRump each other (prior to the primaries). Bredesen's conserva-Dem-ness turns me off. But I suppose he is wagering that TN Democrats have little recourse. Unless TN Dems want the horrible Marsha Blackburn to win what choice do they have but vote for him? Even though he is a conserva-Dem. Like Joe Manchin (the ONLY Democrat to vote for Brett).
In a Blackburn ad, tRump (in a clip I'm guessing is from one of his ego-stroking rallies), proclaims that Bredesen will vote with the Dems and against the MAGA agenda "every time". But Phil has an ad in which he says he doesn't care where ideas come from. If tRump is for something and it's a good thing, he'll vote for it.
To which I say... what are the chances that will happen? Close to none, I'd wager. Yet Phil has to make a point of him possibly voting with and cooperating with Republicans. He also stresses that he "worked across party lines" as governor. Uninformed voters might think he is a republican... if they didn't watch any of Marsha's ads. According to Marsha, Phil is a corrupt ultra-Liberal who will raise your taxes 19 percent to pay for his healthcare plan (despite kicking people off TNcare and OPPOSING the ACA).
BTW, did you hear that the White Supremacists are upset that Swift endorsed Bredesen? Apparently they assumed that the White, blonde, blue-eyed Swift was some kind of Aryan princess. Or an "Aryan Goddess [and] Nazi Avatar of the White European People". LOL.
Rational Liberal social policy coupled with a rational Conservative fiscal policy is what might MAGA. But of course that would require rational leadership. Something severely lacking in the current political environment.
ReplyDeleteExtreme radical conservatives and extreme radical liberals are controlling the political dialogue forcing more moderate candidates to move either right or left (depending on where they live) to have even a chance of being elected. We are a fatally divided nation. One in which rational compromise is all but a thing of the past.
Unfortunate, sad, and likely irreversible. Time will tell whether this nation will survive as the democratic republic that our founding fathers left us.
What is an example of an "extreme radical liberal" who is "controlling the political dialogue" in your opinion, RN? Me, I'd say there are very few to none. Depending on your definition of "radical".
ReplyDeleteI think we need more of these "extreme radical liberals" voicing their opinions, given that most Americans are Liberal, even if they don't know it.
That was my question as well, DS. At least on the state and national level, I don’t see any “extreme radical” liberals. The great divide is caused by conservatives moving to the extreme right. The problem with that is the tendency for the middle to move to the right too.
ReplyDeleteOperative word... Compromise. These days few are willing to do so. With the exception of moderates. A dying breed it seems. :(
ReplyDeleteCompromise is more difficult when it swings the middle to far either left or right. You can’t compromise with “crazy”.
ReplyDeleteI think it was Barry Goldwater that said (I paraphrase)... extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. The problem with the rightwing these days is the only liberty they are concerned with is the liberty they and their ideology find acceptable. I guess their definition of liberty is limited.
ReplyDeleteSo yes Jerry, compromise is becoming more difficult. For both sides.