Sunday, September 04, 2016

Julian Assange Wants Donald Trump To Be The Next US President

True information does good ~ Julian Assange (dob 7/3/1971) an Australian computer programmer, journalist and editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, which he founded in 2006.

The following is an excerpt from the 8/26/2016 airing of the Thom Hartmann Radio Program (edited for brevity and clarity by me). Thom welcomes Ellen Ratner from Talk Media News to the program and, during their discussion Ellen shares news she has heard regarding Julian Assange and his threats of releasing hacked data that will send Hillary Clinton to prison (data that was either obtained by Russian hacker groups or DNC staffer Seth Rich - who HRC had murdered for his betrayal).

Ellen Ratner: Julian Assange is saying he's going to do a new leak from WikiLeaks. Now, I have to tell you something, my brother Michael was Julian Assange's attorney before he died (that's before Michael died, Julian Assange is still alive)... and a lot of people think that what Julian Assange is actually doing is, he has made a bet that he's going to do better under Trump than Hillary Clinton, so he's going after Hillary Clinton.

Thom Hartmann: Really? That's a very bad bet.

Ellen Ratner: That's what the inside score is telling us. I'm hearing that from the behind-the-scenes folks.

Thom Hartmann: In other words Assange is using WikiLeaks for his own purposes.

As I discussed in SWTD #342, Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary Clinton.

The title of my commentary was "On The Possibility Of The WikiLeaks Release Of DNC Hacked Material Throwing The Election To Donald Trump", and, at the time, my belief that Julian Assange was just going with the material he had. That is, he has material regarding HRC, but not regarding DJT. And that he was just doing what his organization does - leak governmental material.

I mean, the guy isn't a US citizen, so it doesn't matter to him as much if DJT becomes president. But now, with this revelation from Ellen Ratner (an individual I trust), it's looking like Assange WANTS Trump to be president. I'm not sure what Ellen is referring to by Assange betting that "he's going to do better". Except to guess that Assange is worried about being snatched by the US and spirited away to the United States for trial.

The reclusive figure fears he will ultimately be sent to the US where he could face the death penalty. In an interview with The Times magazine, Mr Assange claimed it had become too dangerous to even poke his head out the embassy's balcony doors. [Due to] fears he will be assassinated or even "droned" by the American intelligence services if he leaves his hideout within the Ecuadorean embassy. (Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claims he'll be killed by CIA drone if he leaves embassy by Tom Batchelor. 8/30/2015

Assange may also not want HRC to be president (and be trying to use WikiLeaks to tip the election in favor of Trump), as he has written "I have had years of experience in dealing with Hillary Clinton and have read thousands of her cables. Hillary lacks judgement and will push the United States into endless, stupid wars which spread terrorism. ... she certainly should not become president of the United States" (Source).

I don't know what cables Assange has read, but I think he has a point. Although we're already in a fight with ISIS and I think whoever is president will have enough on their plate without starting any new conflicts. But HRC is definitely a hawk (SWTD #323).

But if Assange is going after HRC to see if you can influence US elections and get DJT elected president? I say he should f*ck off. Especially if his motivation is that DJT will consider him a friendly (like he does with Putin) and not try to prosecute or kill him. I haven't heard anything about the US wanting to prosecute Assange. Not recently, anyway.

I thought Assange got into this line of work for altruistic reasons. Because he's a believer in governmental transparency. But now he's trying to get Trump elected to save his own skin? That's IF he's correct and that a president Trump would call off the assassins and circling drones. Me, I don't know if Assange is mostly paranoid here or if his fears are genuine.

I'm sure our government doesn't like him. And I don't think that would change under a Trump administration. In any case, Assange said (re any possible Trump leaks) "we'd be very happy to receive and publish it". But he says he has nothing. And he also says "the problem with the Trump campaign is it's actually hard for us to publish much more controversial material than what comes out of Donald Trump's mouth every second day" (Assange: WikiLeaks's Trump info no worse than him).

So this definitely sounds possible. Unless Assange was able to obtain (or has) Trump's tax returns (showing he pays no taxes, owes a lot of money to Russian oligarchs, has a net worth that is a lot lower than what he says it is, shows he donates very little or nothing to charity, etc), actual physical results (not that BS letter from Dr. Bornstein), and other unknown secrets.

BTW, that's not counting the horrible stuff that's out there but that the press is ignoring. Such as the fact that he raped his ex-wife Ivana (sometime before 1992) and the pending lawsuit regarding his alleged rape of a 13YO in 1994.

And then there's the marginally covered ugly Trump facts, first among these being his pandering to the alt-Right racists and the fact that (IMO) he's a huge racist himself (SWTD #347). As well as a sexist and possibly an anti-semite (we know his new campaign manager Steve Bannon is a racist, a homophobe and an anti-semite).

So how about you, Julian Assange, stop trying to make this man our next president? I mean, I'll take HRC over DJT any day of the week. Fact is, I think she'll make a decent president (even though I was for Bernie Sanders), while Donald Trump would be a disaster in more ways then I think we can possibly imagine. The racist "alt Right" is LOVING Trump, and you KNOW a Trump presidency would further embolden them (SWTD #347).

Which is why I say that, whatever "true information" Assange has on HRC, if it swings the election to DJT, that will definitely not be good. It will, in fact be bad. Very bad.

Video1: Megyn Kelly interviews Julian Assange. Fox Nooz, of course, being receptive to dirt that could bring down the HRC campaign (21:40).

Video2: Rightwingers call for Julian Assange to be assassinated. Institutional Democrats call for him to be prosecuted. I'm opposed to either, especially given the fact that Assange is not a US citizen and not subject to our laws (2:42).

SWTD #348


  1. Interesting stuff. Thank you for the comic relief of Megyn. First she touts her interview like it's the sexiest thing going in right-wing media, even though she already knows it's a dud. Then she's ready to lick her lips for the tiniest morsel of anti-Hillary crumbs. What a scream. Yeah, Megyn, hopefully just in time for November 8th. How about Friday night, November 4th? Is that good for you. Hee-hee-hee.

    I told you I didn't trust that rat Assange. I don't buy into the bullshit account of the Swedish government cooperating with U.S. intelligence to frame him for sexual harassment. But I knew I couldn't trust him when he released the DNC stuff. That's just a dead give-away that he is working for Putin and Trump. There was no criminal mischief that the U.S. public or international community needed to know about. Perhaps he is being led down the rabbit-hole by a bigger con man than himself as far as this nonsense about a damaging report on Hillary. Might as well try to dig up some dirt on Bob Dole or Billy Graham. What a fantasy!

    Assange may have co-founded Wikileaks for the right reasons. Who can really say? But he was one of the first full-time employees to convert his position with Wikileaks into a salaried one. They say that power corrupts. It didn't seem to do Trump any good.

  2. Here's my latest post, so you don't have to steal it:

    Dervish Sanders, the King Shithead. Crowned that 3 years ago, and well deserved.

    This mentally ill criminal has sent me over 200 comments in only 2 days. That alone shows an unstable asshole, but those emails were about him murdering, which makes him a criminal. This sicko is supported by RN, Pam, Shaw, FJ, and many more assholes. Funny, they are all assholes who have stolen my work product and claimed it as their own. Nothing is more despicable. If this criminally insane asshole comes to your blog, call the police. They have a file on him and want more information.

    1. That isn't a post from your blog, TOM. And yes, I know now with 100 percent certainty that you are TOM. I'm the "King Shithead", and that is a title I have been "crowned" with, huh? Those are the exact phrases used by TOM on this blog multiple times. And no, you didn't just read what TOM wrote and decided you liked it. TOM tried that excuse when he was caught using the same language as Steve. The reason they use the same phrases is that Steve, TOM and Luke are all the same person.

      Steve: Shithead being a shithead again. Of course you are just living up your crown, KING SHITHEAD. (6/9/2014).

      TOM: Thanks for continuing to prove you are the king shithead, as crowned years ago HA HA HA HA. (11/15/2015).

      Luke: Dervish Sanders, the King Shithead. Crowned that 3 years ago, and well deserved. (see above).

      Oh, and TOM also called me a criminal and said he contacted the police about me.

      TOM: And you have proven yourself a criminal. THANK YOU. Evidence passed onto the police. Enjoy! (1/26/2016).

      As for being mentally ill, the blogger Octopus called out TOM (AKA Steve, AKA Luke) on this awhile back.

      An excerpt from Octopus' comment...

      Octopus: About this suspected troll named TOM, I recall some details dating back 6 to 7 years ago. If memory serves, his blog was called Stay Awhile, and I recall a few posts and comments that alluded to some kind of medical issue involving brain surgery. With these details, although few and purely conjectural, one can infer that Tom’s claim of having brain surgery may be true. Over time, I noticed gradual changes in his online behavior. In recent years, these messages have become more delusional in content.

      Gradual personality changes, delusional thoughts, and most especially an inability to regulate social interactions are often a result of brain surgery and would account for erratic behaviors. (12/14/2015).

      Comments that are "delusional in content"? That describes Luke's comment to a "T". I'm talking about "they are all assholes who have stolen my work product and claimed it as their own" when NOBODY has stolen anything of his. BTW, I did not send you over 200 comments in only 2 days. I sent you 159 comments. I know this (and so do you) because I numbered them. I thought that if I annoyed you enough you'd stop spamming my blog with your posts (so I don't have to steal them). Obviously it didn't work. But the reason is because (as Octopus pointed out) Steve/TOM/Luke is SERIOUSLY mentally ill. NONE of my comments concerned me murdering (for the record).

  3. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

  4. Thanks for admitting you are truly insane. The number of emails alone prove that. Your insane mind can believe whatever. Similar statements don't prove anything, especially since many had the same statement, you are king shithead. Many read that and you still have it on your blog. Your mental retardation can be seen in your confused thinking. The FBI is looking at your blog. Good Luck.

  5. Thanks for admitting you are truly insane. That you keep returning to this blog (and others) to harass the proprietors with your delusions proves that what Octopus wrote about you was correct.

    As for the "similar" statements (actually we're talking about phrases that match exactly), many people have not read them. Since this blog gets very little traffic, and the newest "crowned king shithead" comment is over 9 moths old. You didn't read it, agree with it, then repeat it. You wrote it (while signed in with your "TOM" account). And I already caught you using "by" when you meant "bye". Same as Steve/TOM.

    The FBI is not looking at my blog. The FBI has way more important things to investigate than a blogger complaining about getting too many comments from the same person.

    Now get lost. Time to create a new ID because Luke is banned.


  7. Your explanation of why you would send anyone 200 emails in 2 days is ridiculous. You have simply proven you area PSYCHO KILLER!

  8. Now,now girls.....stop the cat fight


Comment moderation has temporarily been suspended. Although I may be forced to reinstate it if the trolls take advantage.