tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post8735853740126376607..comments2023-09-16T04:45:50.404-05:00Comments on Sleeping with The Devil: On The Possibility Of The WikiLeaks Release Of DNC Hacked Material Throwing The Election To Donald TrumpDervish Sandershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-51736859232752095282016-08-06T11:12:38.928-05:002016-08-06T11:12:38.928-05:00Jerry, I'm not sure. But the fact is I really ...Jerry, I'm not sure. But the fact is I really don't care. The DNC should have been thankful that he didn't pull a Ralph Nader. Instead DWS was resentful. And, when she was supposed to be neutral, rigged things for HRC. If she can be prosecuted, I hope she is.<br /><br />CBS News: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/wasserman-schultz-could-face-legal-complaint-related-to-email-leak/" rel="nofollow">Wasserman Schultz could face legal complaint related to email leak</a>... Tim Canova, DWS's primary challenger for her Florida House seat, said... that he intends to launch a legal complaint over what he believes is evidence that the congresswoman misused DNC funds for her own re-election campaign.<br /><br />"The Wikileaks emails indicate that Debbie Wasserman Schultz used DNC resources to assist her reelection campaign in violation of federal law", Canova, a law professor, said in a statement. DNC officials, he added, used "party resources to monitor, respond to, and impede my campaign on numerous occasions".Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-67593725355311102912016-08-06T11:00:19.549-05:002016-08-06T11:00:19.549-05:00Luke: As I said, you will get my new posts every t...<i>Luke: As I said, you will get my new posts every time I post one...</i><br /><br />No, I won't. No further Luke comments that appear to be posts from his blog will be published. I'll assume that a comment is a post from Luke's blog by length. If it's too long I won't publish it (this applies only to Luke). I do NOT want material from Luke's blog published on my blog.<br /><br />BTW, I am familiar with Shaw and her blog and know she does not steal material. Also, I have no "first line method", I only said I checked the first line of your post last time. It isn't a "method".<br /><br />If you want to link to comments from Shaw's blog that support your case that Shaw steals your stuff - go ahead. But I suspect there is a reason you didn't already do that. I'm not going to put in time looking into your very likely bogus claims.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-20494216027812267532016-08-06T10:24:20.595-05:002016-08-06T10:24:20.595-05:00You rely on the plagiarist Shaw, that's your m...You rely on the plagiarist Shaw, that's your mistake asshole. Check my original post on my blog where it came from lying asshole. How come you didn't check Shaw's blog for my posts? Just use your stupid first line method and you will find at least 3 posts on mine stolen by Shaw. Have a nice day fuck head. You can't even track anything correctly and you censor so who the fuck knows what you are talking about. As I said, you will get my new posts every time I post one, so you don't have to steal them fucke head liar. . Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11597062711930899788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-76072050304152004002016-08-05T20:42:58.310-05:002016-08-05T20:42:58.310-05:00OK, you have a point, BUT if what you say is true,...OK, you have a point, BUT if what you say is true, then why has Sanders always been an independent?<br /><br />Certainly most of the Progressive caucus members are democrats. (I haven't checked to see if any members other than Sanders are independents.) I'm not questioning other Democrats who happen to be Progressives. I am one myself and was certainly more aligned with Sanders than Clinton. But that's not what I was talking about.<br />Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-81895786598220533912016-08-05T20:10:48.097-05:002016-08-05T20:10:48.097-05:00I'm shocked, Jerry. Debbie Wasserman Schultz t...I'm shocked, Jerry. Debbie Wasserman Schultz thought cheating was OK too. Bernie Sanders obviously never had a chance. Sorry, but I gotta call BS on your "political not philosophical move". What he did WAS political (in a GOOD way), but he did NOT need to move philosophically to run as a Democrat because (1) Bernie Sanders has always caucused with the Democrats, and (2) he was one of the founders of the Progressive caucus, the largest Congressional caucus (proof that there are MANY Democrats philosophically aligned with Bernie). You think <a href="https://cpc-grijalva.house.gov/caucus-members/" rel="nofollow">Progressive caucus members</a> aren't real Democrats?Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-33972315022253414242016-08-05T18:18:36.243-05:002016-08-05T18:18:36.243-05:00I don't see what the big deal is about a coupl...I don't see what the big deal is about a couple of emails with minor issues classified, or with the DNC favoring Clinton. Sanders is an Independent, although he did temporarily become a democrat so he could run as a democrat. It was purely a political move not a philosophical move.Jerry Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-27961284464531807002016-08-05T17:01:14.121-05:002016-08-05T17:01:14.121-05:00Given the fact that the next president might selec...Given the fact that the next president might select up to 4 SCOTUS judges, I don't care WHAT is revealed in the next WikiLeaks release. Say they release a voicemail in which Hillary speaks about how she got away with murdering Vince Foster... I'd still vote for her. That's unlikely, though. Let's say there is a voice mail in which she discusses with Debbie Wasserman Schultz how they're going to steal the primary from Bernie Sanders. I'd still vote for her. I wouldn't like it, but Trump selecting SCOTUS judges? We'd be stuck with these people for decades. Even if Trump is a one term (or less) president.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-60742841683240503402016-08-04T23:37:02.779-05:002016-08-04T23:37:02.779-05:00I'm glad you took my comment in the right spir...I'm glad you took my comment in the right spirit Derv.<br /><br />Peace be unto you.Flying Juniorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02098313953658606206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-38757028181208203342016-08-04T19:31:48.125-05:002016-08-04T19:31:48.125-05:00From Reddit's Politics forum, comment attached...From <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit" rel="nofollow">Reddit</a>'s Politics forum, comment attached to the thread on "Election Justice USA finds that Bernie Sanders lost an estimated 184 delegates to Election Fraud".<br /><br /><i>Terminal-Psychosis: I'm just gonna vote Bernie anyway, though the grapevine says many, many former Dems are going to the Green party.</i><br /><br />So much for people taking the clear choice. Or "getting the fuck outta the way". Some are going to Jill Stein. Others (the dumber ones) will vote for Trump or Gary Johnson.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-36993465429301511892016-08-04T17:44:58.884-05:002016-08-04T17:44:58.884-05:00That's because I write my own stuff asshole.
...<i>That's because I write my own stuff asshole.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://lwlink3.linkwithin.com/api/click?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_147035026877812&key=8a69ede45b8445f6b533712ba9899ffb&libId=irgwewyl0100r7tw000DA83k82ksm&loc=http%3A%2F%2Frationalnationusa.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F07%2Fthoughts-on-rnc-and-dnc-2016.html&v=1&out=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogger.com%2Fprofile%2F08637273000409613497&ref=http%3A%2F%2Frationalnationusa.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F08%2Fas-republican-2016-nominee-for-potus.html&title=Rational%20Nation%20USA%3A%20Thoughts%20On%20The%20RNC%20And%20The%20DNC%202016...&txt=Shaw%20%20Kenawe" rel="nofollow">Shaw Kenawe</a>: For a troll who runs around the internet accusing people of plagiarizing his work, it is hilarious to read "Luke's" two comments which were taken <a href="http://lwlink3.linkwithin.com/api/click?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_147035016013211&key=8a69ede45b8445f6b533712ba9899ffb&libId=irgwewyl0100r7tw000DA83k82ksm&loc=http%3A%2F%2Frationalnationusa.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F07%2Fthoughts-on-rnc-and-dnc-2016.html&v=1&out=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.nader.org%2F2016%2F07%2F29%2Fhillarys-convention-con-job%2F&ref=http%3A%2F%2Frationalnationusa.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F08%2Fas-republican-2016-nominee-for-potus.html&title=Rational%20Nation%20USA%3A%20Thoughts%20On%20The%20RNC%20And%20The%20DNC%202016...&txt=word-for-word%20from%20Ralph%20Nader%27s%20site." rel="nofollow">word-for-word from Ralph Nader's site</a>. (<a href="http://rationalnationusa.blogspot.com/2016/07/thoughts-on-rnc-and-dnc-2016.html?showComment=1469971557155#c5614115674721407086" rel="nofollow">7/31/2016 comment</a> from the "Rational Nation USA" blog).<br /><br />I followed Shaw's link and noted that what she says is absolutely true. What you posted to RN's blog is a cut and paste from Ralph Nader's site. Proof that Luke's steals the words of others. Where is your proof Luke? You got anything to back up your ludicrous claim that "you and your idiot minions keep stealing my words"? I predict you will come up with NOTHING. Like I told you previously, *I* write my own stuff. I am NOT interested in stealing from you (or stealing from Ralph Nader's site, or anyone else YOU steal from).Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-33045064837659926502016-08-04T16:04:15.455-05:002016-08-04T16:04:15.455-05:00That's because I write my own stuff asshole. A...That's because I write my own stuff asshole. And it must be good since you and your idiot minions keep stealing my words, yet, cry plagiarism. What a bunch of lying assholes.<br />Hey Jerry, you haven't written a word for years. Go Fuck Yourself lying asshole. The only thing copy and paste, are your lies. Exactly the same as the lies from Dervish and the rest of the assholes. <br />So keep searching idiot Dervish, you won't find anything, because I am original and you are just a lying asshole. Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11597062711930899788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-44180433054190901142016-08-04T12:34:13.643-05:002016-08-04T12:34:13.643-05:00I Googled the first line, but didn't find anyt...I Googled the first line, but didn't find anything. You know who he's cutting and pasting from this time?Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-81662880542562742242016-08-04T12:32:31.889-05:002016-08-04T12:32:31.889-05:00That Assange isn't an American is irrelative. ...That Assange isn't an American is irrelative. What is relative is what might be in the 2nd WikiLeaks date release. It might be enough to send HRC to prison as Assange claims, or it might not be. We don't know yet. I doubt it is. As for Assange being a "wanted criminal" the charges against him are (as far as I can tell) bullshit (<a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/07/how-the-swedes-set-up-julian-assange/" rel="nofollow">How the Swedes Set Up Julian Assange</a>). Assange is still living in the Ecuador embassy because he believes he will be extradited from Sweden to the US if he leaves, or that "he could he could be snatched by the CIA and spirited away to the US [where] he could be put on trial for espionage". IMO he has reason to be concerned.<br /><br />As for the choice being clear. That's true. For you (and me) the clear choice is HRC. For others the clear choice is DJT. And the DNC leak which led to the resignation of the DNC chair by the corrupt DWS (emails show she was using DNC to monitor her FL primary challenger, a violation of Federal election laws) has likely convinced on-the-fence B-S supporters not to vote for HRC.<br /><br />I predict the HRC critics will NOT "get the fuck outta the way". I think we will be hearing from them a LOT in the coming months. And that worries me.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-20892132016640544302016-08-03T23:13:14.047-05:002016-08-03T23:13:14.047-05:00Julian Assange isn't even an American. And he...Julian Assange isn't even an American. And he is a wanted criminal living in some embassy. Since the guy is obviously a whore hound, he probably did assault those two women, even if his supporters actually believe that he was set up.<br /><br />As far as Hillary vs. Trump. The choice is clear. You either lend a hand or get the fuck outta the way.Flying Juniorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02098313953658606206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-20283562740247634262016-08-02T21:02:42.758-05:002016-08-02T21:02:42.758-05:00"Cut and paste" Luke strikes again."Cut and paste" Luke strikes again.Jerry Critterhttps://draft.blogger.com/profile/01870618647449723147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-40952069895204104132016-08-02T17:59:19.667-05:002016-08-02T17:59:19.667-05:00Trump
Trump has been trying hard to chase away Rep... Trump<br />Trump has been trying hard to chase away Republican support. He obviously doesn't like Republicans. Recently he has said he doesn't support Ryan, or McCain and is actively supporting other people for their seats in the upcoming election. McCain and Ryan have halfheartedly supported Trump simply because he is the Republican nominee, as have many other Republicans. They continue to come out and denounce his statements on various issues, including the latest dust up about Mr. and Mrs. Kahn, yet, continue to say he is the only choice to be the next president. Certainly it is a choice of two evils for Republicans, with Hillary being the most evil.<br />It's the majority of the Republican voters who have put Trump in his position and Republican leadership in their uncomfortable position. Trump is an outsider as a Republican, as much as Sanders was an outsider in the Democratic party. The Republicans chose the outsider, the Democrats did not. That puts Trump at a disadvantage for Republican party unity and getting the most possible votes out of Republicans. Hillary won her party's nomination, but Sander supporters claim they won't vote for her and decades of negative Hillary feelings within the Democratic party towards Hillary means she won't get the most available democratic votes. That negativity towards Hillary from within the Democratic party is why she lost to Obama (an unknown) even though she was considered a shoe in to win the Democratic nomination in 2008.<br />This will leave the undecided vote (at a high of 20%) to decide who the winner will be. That's one of the only normal facts about this election. The undecided voters often decide who will be president. I doubt a huge democratic voter turnout (which hasn't appeared during the primary's) can make up that 20% undecided vote. Those undecided voters seem to be in the same quandary, which candidate is less evil, which candidate do they dislike more.<br />Democrats are hoping Trump's big mouth will get those undecided voters to go with Hillary, but there is no sign that is happening. The "Teflon Don" has yet to say something that has changed the mind of those undecided voters. The undecided percentage hasn't changed in months. Even the negative comments from Republican leaders about Trump hasn't had an effect on the undecided number. The traditional ideal of what a president should be characteristically doesn't seem to matter. As repulsive as Trump can be, that hasn't changed the undecided voters, yet. Similarly, all the negativity about Hillary hasn't changed that undecided number. These undecided voters will probably not vote, or make up their minds as they vote. Just make a pick, like pin the tail on the donkey. It's a crummy choice in their eyes.<br />As for me; my State will go big for Hillary, so I probably won't vote. If I was in a State that was close, I would vote for Hillary based only on my repulsion for Trump. I am not a Hillary fan. Good luck with your choice, undecideds. Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11597062711930899788noreply@blogger.com