tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post1559383385739825212..comments2023-09-16T04:45:50.404-05:00Comments on Sleeping with The Devil: Virulently Anti-Green Conservative Blogger Advocates For Dangerous & Expensive Nuke EnergyDervish Sandershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-74878367600624189922013-06-16T14:46:06.045-05:002013-06-16T14:46:06.045-05:00Yes, FJ, that is why the cost is so high (after fa...Yes, FJ, that is why the cost is so high (after factoring in all the things you list). Nuke power is the MOST expensive AND dangerous energy in existence. We need to move away from it before we experience our own Fukushima.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976234.post-88351828923153527472013-03-28T15:36:24.083-05:002013-03-28T15:36:24.083-05:00Fukushima has to be the worst disaster of the cent...Fukushima has to be the worst disaster of the century. New victims and new diseases will continue to emerge into the future. Horrifying.<br /><br />I thought of my own (happily off-line) plant in San Onofre California. I looked for historical earthquake data only to find a major quake in the sea only thirty miles distant from Oceanside less than two hundred years ago. Maybe only fifty or sixty miles away from the nuclear facility. Popular opinion being what it is in California, right on the heels of Fukushima, chances are it will never be put back on-line.<br /><br />Jackson Browne and Bonnie Raitt did a Stage-It concert against nuclear energy a couple of years ago. The song was called "Poison Fire."<br /><br />Are you for real Will? I guess the cost is high because there are enormous costs associated with manufacturing, transporting and storing radioactive materials. Not to mention the cost of operating them (hopefully) safely.Flying Juniorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02098313953658606206noreply@blogger.com